Archive for The Pope

Bishops, Bentleys, & Bling!


The lavish lifestyles of pastors has become a major topic amongst those who would like to see the donations made to the church reserved for the people it was intended to help, the congregation. Prosperity Preachers have used the doctrine of Tithes to fleece working class congregations out of millions of dollars, all based on the 3rd chapter of Malachi.

If you truly take the time to examine the origin of tithes you will discover that the sole purpose of paying tithes was for consumption by the believers, by the children of Israel. It was never intended to increase the personal wealth of church leadership. Do you honestly think that our loving Christ would approve of a pastor riding around in a $350k car while the members within that same congregation face foreclosure?

I find it interesting that prosperity preachers repeatedly ask us to turn to old testament chapters of the bible in order to mandate that we pay 10% of our income, but conveniently they omit the other old testament chapters that clearly state that the tithe was to be consumed in front of the Lord. The tithe was collected to ensure that there were resources available for a feast before the Lord (Duet 12:17-19).

As brilliantly scribed by FreeTheChurch.org

“The tithe was indeed to be brought to the Temple (v. 18), but notice it is the bearer of the tithe who was to consume the tithe (thou must eat them before the LORD). That is not at all what occurs today. The tithe today is given to the church, whereas in the Old Testament, the tithe was consumed by the people who had it so they would rejoice before the Lord.

The tithe was used for a party. If we used our tithe to celebrate, more people would bring it to the church! God’s desire has never changed. When the writer of Hebrews said: “By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name.” (Heb 13:15 KJV) this was no new commandment. It is what God has always desired.”

When Christ was on earth he endured non-stop verbal attacks, not from the officials in Rome but from Preachers who felt threatened by this new doctrine. This new doctrine promoted charity, giving, humbleness, compassion, and moral regard, something that was obviously missing from ministry during that particular time.

Christ began to do radical things like take a little bit and turn it into enough to feed thousands. He used his God given abilities to heal the medical conditions and spiritual conditions of anyone who had a need.
If we call ourselves Christians, then our actions as leaders in the church should reflect Christ like actions. How do you justify buying a Falcon Series Luxury Jet while so many in people setting in the pews have real needs? If spreading the word of God is the reason given to justify the purchase of the jet, then have you considered driving to cities in the surrounding areas or preaching the “Glorious Gospel” on a street corner? If your heart was really into spreading the word of God then YouTube and Blog Talk Radio will give you that opportunity for free, imagine that.

Mr. Pastor before you make your next multimillion dollar luxury purchase please consider this. All of the money you have right now came from working class people who gave believing in a sermon you taught. A sermon that harped on how God will bless them because they gave to you, and many of them are still waiting on God to do what you said he would do.

Please Consider This Before You Buy Your Next Bentley

How many people could you help if you took the purchase price of your Bentley and applied it directly to your congregation? How many light bills could you pay with $350k? How many medical prescriptions could you fill with $350k? How many tuitions payments could you make for members in your congregation with $350k? How many homes could you (the pastor) save from foreclosure with $350k?

To help you out Mr. Pastor we have decided to list the immediate impact you could have on your congregation if you really decided to do something Christ like and give!

I have calculated the above number using the $350k purchase price of a 2010 Bentley but imagine how many people you can help with the money you’re planning spend for a private jet ($7.5 million).

The time has now arrived for the members in the pews to demand a feast, a celebration before the Lord financed with the tithes that have already been collected. Even Jesus made sure that the host of the reception had enough wine to serve everyone in attendance, but a Pastor from this day and age would simply raise another offering to cover the cost.

WikiLeaks: Pope refused to cooperate in sex abuse investigation!


Pope Benedict refused to allow Vatican officials to testify in an investigation by an Irish commission into alleged child sex abuse by priests, according to U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks, The Guardian newspaper reported.

Benedict was also reportedly furious when Vatican officials were called upon in Rome, The Guardian reported Saturday.

The Murphy Commission of Inquiry into sexual and physical abuse “offended many in the Vatican,” according to a cable dated February 26, 2010.

“The Vatican believes the Irish government failed to respect and protect Vatican sovereignty during the investigations,” it said.

On Saturday, the Vatican press office declined to comment on the content of the cables but decried the leaks as a matter of “extreme gravity.”

The U.S. ambassador to the Holy See also condemned the leaks and said the Vatican and America cooperate in promoting universal values.

Other latest revelations include that Britain’s Vatican ambassador feared anti-Catholic violence in Britain after Benedict offered to accept traditionalist Anglicans into the Roman Catholic Church.

Catholic-Anglican relations faced their worst crisis in 150 years because of the offer, which undercut the authority of Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, the cable quoted Ambassador Francis Campbell as saying after the offer last year.

Five Anglican bishops in Britain announced last month that they would join the Catholic Church early next year, in response to the offer made in October 2009 to Anglican clergy opposed to the ordination of women bishops in the Church of England.

The cable, dated November 30, 2009 and published by The Guardian, reflected concerns that have since eased. Tensions that it predicted for the pope’s visit to Britain in September this year did not materialize.

Immunity granted to Vatican officials
According to the cable detailing the Vatican’s refusal to cooperate in the abuse investigation, the Vatican believed opposition politicians in Ireland were publicly putting pressure on the government to vilify the Vatican just to make “political hay”.

The Irish government, meanwhile, wanted “to be seen as co-operating with the investigation” because its churches and education department were also involved in the scandal.

The Irish ambassador’s deputy, Helena Keleher, told U.S. diplomats that her government eventually acquiesced to the Vatican and granted their officials immunity from testifying, the Guardian reported.

“Foreign ambassadors are not required or expected to appear before national commissions,” the cable said.

Still, the Irish commission was able to gather enough evidence and testimony to conclude that some bishops had put the Catholic church before the victims by covering up claims of abuse, the Guardian reported.

In the cable describing the British fears over anti-Catholic violence, U.S. ambassador to the Vatican Miguel Diaz said British ambassador Campbell noted that England’s Catholics were a minority and mostly of Irish origin.

“There is still latent anti-Catholicism in some parts of England and it may not take much to set it off,” it said, paraphrasing his words. “The outcome could be discrimination or in isolated cases even violence against this minority.”

Speaking after the two churchmen met at the Vatican last month, Campbell said the pope had “put Williams in an impossible situation” and the archbishop’s cautious reaction — meant to avoid harming relations with Rome — angered some Anglicans.

Diaz ended the cable asking “whether the damage to inter-Christian relations was worth it — especially since the number of disaffected Anglicans that will convert is likely to be a trickle rather than a wave.”

Another cable dated November 9, 2009 said Campbell told Diaz that the Catholic Church would face “unforeseen obstacles” if many traditionalist Anglicans took up Benedict’s offer.

“A large transition of Anglican converts could overwhelm the financial resources of many dioceses,” it cited him as saying.

No consideration for Church of England
The Anglicans most likely to make the switch were the most conservative, he said.

“In uniting traditionalist Anglicans with the Catholic Church, the pope is bringing together two groups strongly committed to defending Europe’s Christian heritage — a theme he strongly champions,” it added.

The cable cited an unnamed source as saying Williams was probably informed about the offer only a day before it was announced. When he expressed concern about it, he was told the Vatican had made its decision and was going ahead.

According to the November 30 cable, Campbell felt the Vatican had acted without considering what its move would mean for the Church of England, mother church for the world’s 80 million Anglicans, or their spiritual leader Williams.

“The Vatican decision seems to have been aimed primarily at Anglicans in the U.S. and Australia, with little thought given to how it would affect the center of Anglicanism, England, or the Archbishop of Canterbury,” it said in relating his view.

The Vatican announced last month that its first so-called ordinariate for Anglican converts would be established in Britain. Bishops and priests would join the Church in the first half of the year, followed by lay people wanting to switch.