Archive for Catholic Church

Vatican Christmas Shocker! Pope says child rape isn’t that bad, was normal back in his day!


Victims of clerical sex abuse have reacted furiously to Pope Benedict’s claim yesterday that paedophilia wasn’t considered an “absolute evil” as recently as the 1970s.

In his traditional Christmas address yesterday to cardinals and officials working in Rome, Pope Benedict XVI also claimed that child pornography was increasingly considered “normal” by society.

“In the 1970s, paedophilia was theorised as something fully in conformity with man and even with children,” the Pope said.

“It was maintained – even within the realm of Catholic theology – that there is no such thing as evil in itself or good in itself. There is only a ‘better than’ and a ‘worse than’. Nothing is good or bad in itself.”

The Pope said abuse revelations in 2010 reached “an unimaginable dimension” which brought “humiliation” on the Church.

Asking how abuse exploded within the Church, the Pontiff called on senior clerics “to repair as much as possible the injustices that occurred” and to help victims heal through a better presentation of the Christian message.

“We cannot remain silent about the context of these times in which these events have come to light,” he said, citing the growth of child pornography “that seems in some way to be considered more and more normal by society” he said.

But outraged Dublin victim Andrew Madden last night insisted that child abuse was not considered normal in the company he kept.

Mr Madden accused the Pope of not knowing that child pornography was the viewing of images of children being sexually abused, and should be named as such.

He said: “That is not normal. I don’t know what company the Pope has been keeping for the past 50 years.”

Pope Benedict also said sex tourism in the Third World was “threatening an entire generation”.

Angry abuse victims in America last night said that while some Church officials have blamed the liberalism of the 1960s for the Church’s sex abuse scandals and cover-up catastrophes, Pope Benedict had come up with a new theory of blaming the 1970s.

“Catholics should be embarrassed to hear their Pope talk again and again about abuse while doing little or nothing to stop it and to mischaracterise this heinous crisis,” said Barbara Blaine, the head of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests,

“It is fundamentally disturbing to watch a brilliant man so conveniently misdiagnose a horrific scandal,” she added.

“The Pope insists on talking about a vague ‘broader context’ he can’t control, while ignoring the clear ‘broader context’ he can influence – the long-standing and unhealthy culture of a rigid, secretive, all-male Church hierarchy fixated on self-preservation at all costs. This is the ‘context’ that matters.”

The latest controversy comes as the German magazine Der Spiegel continues to investigate the Pope’s role in allowing a known paedophile priest to work with children in the early 1980s.

SEX and the Mormon Church – a chronological history!


Subject: SEX and the Mormon Church – a chronological history (long)
Date: Dec 31 12:16
Author: Deconstructor
Mail Address:

——————————————————————————–
The Restoration Means God Leads the Mormon Church

“Living prophets are leading this church today. The greatest security of members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints comes from learning to listen to and obey the words and commandments that the Lord has given through living prophets. I would hope that the world would understand the importance of having a living prophet on earth today. In my own lifetime, through association with prophets, I have observed how they are prepared by the Lord. Their purpose is to bring us the will of the Lord for our times. I give my testimony that the prophets of this day have the qualities of the prophets of old and the other prophets of this dispensation. Each of these prophets has humbly and prayerfully sought to know and follow God?s will in his personal ministry. We declare with soberness, and yet with the authority of God in us vested, we have a prophet today. The President of the Church, as a prophet, is God?s representative on earth and is appointed to lead His church.”
-Apostle Robert D. Hales, “Hear the Prophet?s Voice and Obey,” Ensign, May 1995, Page 15

Now look what those leaders have done over the last 150 years. Ask yourself, are these men really God’s representatives on the Earth?

The following historical events regarding sex and marriage in the church have been compiled from the extensive historical church chronology from D. Michael Quinn’s book “The Mormon Hierarchy : Extensions of Power” For references, refer to the book.

Jan 14, 1848 – Brigham Young instructs Seventy’s meeting: “For the first act of adultery you may forgive a man, but if a man beds with a woman and does it 10 times he is guilty.”

11 Mar, 1848 – Benjamin Covey is excommunicated for having sexual intercourse with two girls “less than Twelve years of age” who are his foster daughters. He is rebaptized and serves as bishop of Salt Lake City Twelfth Ward from 22 February 1849 until 1856.

1 Feb, 1849 – First counselor Heber C. Kimball tells Sunday meeting that plural marriage “would end he said when the Church had gone to the Devil or the Prieshood taken from this people – then God would give it to another people.”

3 Mar, 1849 – At council of Fifty meeting, Brigham Young speaks concerning theives, murderers, and sexually licentious: “I want their cursed heads to be cut off that they may atone for their crimes.” Next day, the council agrees that man has “forfeited his Hed,” and decides it would be best “to dispose of him privately.” Instead, they allow him to live.

29 April, 1849 – First Presidentcy and Quorum of Twelve make following decisions concerning sex in marriage “not to unite with woman in view of impregnation till 7 days after the cesation of the menstrual discharge in order for the most healthy procreation. Also that after childbrith if delivered a son she should continue 40 days in her purification [without sexual intercourse with her husband]. If daughter she [the new mother] should be 70 days separated as unclean for a man. As to sexual connexion during pregnancy, do just as they please about that – suit themselves.” This is the earliest known LDS discussion of what is appropriate in sexual relations of married couples. These rules are based on Book of Leviticus, rather than on current medical writings.

15 Jan, 1851 – First of Brigham Youngs’ five formal divorces from plural wives. He is only one formally divorced while serving as church president. Joseph Smith informally ended several plural marriages, and four LDS presidents are formally divorced as apostles (John Talor, Wilford Woodruff, Lorenzo Snow and Joseph F. Smith)

19 Jar, 1851 – Utah legislature enacts law against “Sodomoy” by “any man or boy,” but removes sodomoy from criminal code on 6 Mar. 1852, without explanation. As governor Brigham Young signs both laws. Due to absence of sodomy statue, Utah judge drops charges against soldier for raping LDS boy in 1864. Young claims Utah’s legislators never criminalized sodomy and he declines to instruct them to do so for the next twlve years. Utah legislators criminalize sodomy in 1876 only because federally appointed governor asks them to adopt entire criminal code of California which has five-year imprisonment for sodomoy. For next twenty years LDS judges give 3-6 months of improsoniment to those convicted of homosexual rape, the same sentencing given to young males and females convicted of consensual fornication. Mormons of this era give no known explanations for any of these legislative and jurdicial actions/inactions.

17 MAr, 1851 – Brigham Young speaks in favor of Madison D. Hambleton who is being tried for shooting and killing man at LDS church services, immediately after closing prayer. The man “seduced” wife of Hambletone who is “acquitted by the Court and also by the Voice os the people present.” Hambleton later becomes sheriff in Utah.

18 Oct, 1851 – Trial of confessed murderer (and newly returned-missinary) Howard Egan. His lawyer Apsotle George A. Smith popularizes phrase “mountain common law” and argues: “The man who seduces his neighbor’s wife must die, and her nearest relative must kill him!” Fifteen minutes later jury finds Egan not guilty of murder. Church authorities print Smith’s closing argument in Deseret News, in two church pamphlets, and later in Journal of Discourses 1:97. Egan is one of Brigham Young’s enforcers.

24 July, 1853 – Brigham Young preaches, “The Father came down in his bodily tabernacle and begot Jesus.”

19 Feb, 1854 – Seventy’s president Jedediah M. Grant preaches: Did the Prophet Joseph want every man’s wife that he asked for? He did not….”

16 July, 1854 – First counselor Heber C. Kimball recommends decapitation for adulterers and preaches from the pulpit concerning “unclean” women: “we wipe them out of exsistence.”

8 Oct, 1854 – In what Apostle Wilford Woodruff describes as “the greatest sermon that ever was deliveed to the Latter Day Saints since they have been a people,” Brigham Young announces from the pulpit: “I believe in Sisters marrying brothers, and brothers having their sisters for Wives. Why? because we cannot do otherwise. There are none others for me to and the opposite idea has resulted from the ignorant and foolish traditions of the nations of the earth.” Young’s secretary George D. Watt has already married his own half sister as a plural wife. Her letter to Young shows that he was initially “unfavorable” toward allowing them to marry, but this sermon reveals theological basis for Young’s authorizing Watt’s brother-sister marriage and the three children born of their union.

27 Apr, 1855 – Lieutenant in Colonel E. J. Steptoe’s command in Salt Lake City writes to friend about his romance and near seduction of one of the wives of Brigham Young’s son Joseph (who is on a mission): “Mary [Ayers] Young and I had to give up. Brigham sent me word that if I took her away he would have me killed before I could get out of the Territory. He is a man of his word and little matters of this sort are concluded, I had better not do it, although I went back to the city purposely to get her. We wrote each other affectionate notes.”

27 Mar, 1857 – Brigham Young permits woman to select faithful elders to act as “proxy” to father children for her sexually impotent living husband. Young performs polyandrous ceremony “for time,” and the relationship lasts for several years producting two sons, (1858, 1861). Mother’s legal husband raises boys with her, and later tells them he loves them as much as if they were his natural sons. Both boys grow up to become devoted Mormons and polygamists. This is last knon case of authorized polyandry.

2 June, 1857 – Brigham Young says from the pulit, “I feel to sustain him,” when informed that the bishop in Manti. Waren S. Snow, has castrated twenty-four-year-old Welchman, Thomas Lewis, for undisclosed sex crime. “Just let the matter drop, and say no more about it,” Young writes Snow in July about the castration, “and it will soon die away among the people.” Snow’s counselor confides to his diary that this poor young man “has now gone crazy.”

14 June, 1857 – At a prayer circle of the First Presidency and apostles, Brigham Young refuses to seal three young girls (ages 12 and 13) to “Father James Allred” (age 73) because they “would not be equally yoked together” in marriage.

27 Jan, 1858 – Judge Hosea Stout describes with no disaproval how Mormons “disguised as Indians” drag a man “out of bed with a whore and castrated him by a square and close amputation.”

5 Apr, 1858 – Bishop of Payson, his brother the Sherriff, and sevral members of their LDS congregation join in shooting to death twenty-two-year-old Henry Jones and is mother, Mrs. Hannah Jones Hatch, for committing incest by which she has a daughter. The men also kill infant and also castrate brother/father. Perpetrators are indicted next year, but not brought to trial. When indicted again in 1889, Deseret News article criticizes trial of this “antiquated Payson homicide” as anti-Mormon crusade gainst those who were justifiably “digusted and greatly incensed” against “the brutal mother and son.” Former sherriff is convicted of murder, former bishop is acquitted.

12 Sep, 1858 – Church historian’s office notes discovery this morning of severed head of Provo woman who has been at U.S. military camp for a week. Six weeks earlier another woman’s head is discovered. These are earliest verified examples of someone taking literally the repeated teachings of Mormon leaders that apostates and adulterers should have their heads “cut off” as “blood atonement” for their sins.

2 Jan, 1859 – Brigham Young begins custom of having all Mormon congregations sit with women on north side of center aisle, men on south side, and children on front benches. This seating arrangement lasts for decades, remains in temples to this day.

8 Oct, 1859 – Brigham Young from the pulpit tells bishops to give Melchizedek priesthood to eighteen-year old boys, even if they “have been sowing their wild oats for years.”

8 July, 1860 – Brigham Young preaches from the pulpit, “Children are now born who will live until every son of Adam will have the privledge of receiving the principles of eternal life.” He also preaches, “The birth of our Saviour was as natural as are the births of our children; it was the result of natural action.”

23 Feb 1862 – Brigham Young preaches from the pulpit that the concept of Mother in Heaven is as essential as concept of Father in Heaven.

1 Aug 1862 – Brigham Young writes to a local bishop: “my advice is for bro james T.S. Allred to marry the Indian girl in question. It is written that ‘not many generations shall pass away before they become a white and delightsome people.’” Dozens of men marry Native Americans as plural wives in pioner Utah and Arizona.

12 Apr, 1866 – Deseret News reports murder of S. Newton Brassfield on 2 Apr. He legally maries plrual wife of absent Mormon missionary, and Deseret News editorializes that “the illegaly married couple would probably have been suffered to prusue their way to their own liking,” except that she filed for custody of her children. Deseret News also reports Brigham Young’s sermon about the murdered Brassfield: “Were I absent from my home on a mission, I would rejoice to know that I had friends there to protect and guard the virtue of my household; and I would thank God for such friends.”

19 Aug, 1866 – Brigham Young preaches from the pulpit: “Mary, the wife of Joseph, had another husband. On this account infidels have called the Savior a bastard… he was begotten by God our Heavenly Father.” She was a polyandrist, like the women he authorized in 1857.

11 Dec, 1866 – Brigham Young, Jr. writes in his diary that “a nigger” is found dead in Salt Lake City with this note pinned to the cropse: “Let this be a warning to all niggers that they medle not with white women.”

10 Jan, 1868 – Deseret News Editorial: “In this Territory we jealously close the door against adultery, seduction and whoredom. Public opinion here pronounces the penalty of death as the fitting punishment for such crimes.”

4 Feb, 1868 – Deseret News editorializes that “it is a pity” LDS father did not succeed in killing his daughter’s lover when the father “drew a revolver and shot him down in the court room.”

5 MAr, 1868 – Deseret News article titled “Served Him Right” reports that a Gentile is given “sound thrashing” when he visits LDS meeting to see young woman.

15 Aug, 1869 – Apostle George Q. Canon preaches from the pulpit: “We close the door on one side, and say that whoredoms, seductions and adulteries must not be committed among us, and we say to those who are determined to carry on such things: WE WILL KILL YOU…”

27 Oct, 1869 – Brigham Young preaches at Lehi, Utah that “by marriage Lot’s two daughters were sealed to him, and will be his to all eternity.” Young adds that it might one day become necessary to seals a man’s daughter to him as a wife, “but it is not likely ever again to occur.” There are verified instances of LDS leaders performing polygamous marriages between men and their foster-daughters or step-daughters, but not actual daughters.

18 June, 1870 – First counselor George A. Smith tells Salt Lake School of the Prophets about “the evil of Masturbation” among Utah Mormons. Apostle Lorenzo Snow says that “Plural Marriage would tend to diminish this evil self-pollution,” and he believes that “indulgence on the part of men was less in Plural marriage than in Monogomy.” Elder George Reynolds (Secretary to Brigahm Young) also tells the School that “where Monogomy was the Law, it compelled a more frequent (sexual) cohabitation than is right and proper.” Mormon medical books of the time advise sexual intercourse only once a month.

11 Sep, 1871 – Counselor Daniel H. Wells tells Grantsville School of the Prophets that “a great many of our young men are abusing themselves by the habit of self-pollution: or self abuse, or as the Bible terms it, Onanism,” which he regards as “one great cause why so many of our young men were not married, and it was a great sin, and would lead to insanity and a premature grave.” Polygamy is likelier cause for prevalence of bachelorhood in ninteenth-century Utah. First, every national census lists more males than females in Mormon population. Second, 10 to 40 percent of Mormon men marry polygamously which demographically requires bachelorhood in Utah’s majority population of males.

16 Dec, 1871 – Seymor B. Young, son of senior Seventy’s president, writes: “Salt Lake City has for the first time in its history houses of Ill fame almost on every corner.”

27 Feb, 1872 – LDS publication Millenial Star editorial titled, “Motherhood of God,” repeats a child’s question: “Why don’t you tell me about the Heavenly Mother? Don’t she give us anything?” Editorial speaks of those who “yearn to adore her” and expresses approval of praying to “Father and Mother God.” Editorial conclusion: “When we draw nearer the Divine Man, lo! we shall find a Divine Woman smiling upon us…In the Father’s many mansions, we shall find her and be satisfied.”

7 Mar, 1875 – Apostle Joseph F. Smith’s wife writes to him that “you know how brother (Apostle) [Albert] Carrington thinks a deal of women.” In Dec. 1882 Apostle John Henry Smith writes President John Taylor that maid at British Mission headquarters “found Bro. Carrington lying upon the lounge and Sarah Kirkman lying upon top him.” Upon Brigham Young’s inquiry about other women in 1873 and John Taylor’s inquiry about Sarah Kirkham in 1883, Carrington denies serious wrongdoing. he is not excommunicated until 1885 when protests from Sarah’s husband become too insistent to ignore.

24 June, 1876 – Brigham Young confides that it is “a curiousity to him that men could commit adultery and still retain the spirit of the Lord as he had witnessed on one occasion. The man is now dead.”

26 Sep, 1877 – Grand Jury describes Salt Lake County probate court as a “divorce mill” which granted 300 divorces in previous twelve-month period, primarily on “grounds of incompatibility of temperment, different aims and objectives in life.” Eighty percent of divorced couples come to Utah for divorces from such places as San Francisco, New York City, Chicago, Terre Haute, and St. Louis. Report finds that 13 percent of divorces are granted same day of complaint, total of 25 percent within week of application, and total of 85 percent are granted within a month of aplication. Report continues, “And your committee have good reason to beleive that other country probate courts of the territory are likewise engaged in this class of divorce business, to an equal if not greater extent.” Two months later U.S. senator Dawes introduces bill to remove divorce from jurisdiction of Mormon probate courts and limit divorce cases to federally-appointed non-Momron judges.

13 June, 1878 – LDS political newspaper Salt Lake Herald’s editorial on “Unhappy Marriages” begins: “We cannot say how many divorces the (Mormon) Utah probate courts have granted during the last few years, but the number is enormous, amounting to perhaps thousands.”

8 Oct, 1881 – First Counselor George Q. Cannon tells general conference: “We hear now of men having got married to cover up certain things; of children born wonderfully soon after marriage in some of our setlements, and perhaps in this city no less than in our rural settlements.”

31 Mar, 1883 – Apostle Brigham Young Jr. tells stake priesthood meeting: “There are many girls in Utah who have never had an offer of marriage from a man of the Church… Girls who marry outsiders are not worthy of the Sacrament.”

9 Oct, 1883 – In several hours of meeting with stake presidents, First Presidency and apostles give instructions about “Masturbation…self-pollution of both sexes and excessive sexual indulgence in the married relation.” This is the first-known Mormon referene to female masturabation.

7 Nov, 1885 – Quorum of Twelve excommunicates Apostle Albert Carrington “for crimes of lewd and lascivious conduct and adultery” with several women dating back to 1871. This is the first time since 1842 that a general authority is excommunicated for sexual misconduct, and its publication on 10 Nov. stuns the community.

27 Mar, 1886 – Polygamist husband confides in his personal diary: “How delicate is the position of a man in plural marriage who loves his wives and who in turn is loved by them. Every move he makes, in his relation or intercourse with them, is an arrow that pierces deep into the heart of one or other of them… A thousand thoughts and plans may come into his mind, but there is only one true solution. He must please God. In doing this, it may be hoped that by and by, he may also somehow please them.”

15 July, 1886 – Apostle Lorenzo prophecises from the pulpit that in the future “brothers and sisters would marry each other in this church. All our horror at such a union was due entirely to prejudice, and the offspring of such unions would be as healthy and pure as any other. These were the decided views of President Young, when alive, for Bother Snow talked to him freely on this matter.”

27 Dec, 1886 – Sarah M. Granger Kimball, counselor in Relief Society General Presidency teaches from the pulpit that “her brother Lafayette Granger and the late Bishop George Miller in conversation once with the prophet Joseph smith were told by him that when Mary the mother of Jesus was on her way to the hill country she was met by God the Father and the Angel Gabriel and the latter performed the marriage between Father (God) and Mary.”

21 July, 1887 – Apostle Franklin D. Richards: “God the Father came down in his tabernacle of flesh and bone and had (sexual) association with Mary, and made her pregnant with Jesus.”

27 Feb, 1889 – LDS politcial newspaper Salt Lake Herald’s article titled, “FAILED MARRIAGES,” regarding “the report of the Labor Commissioner Wright, presented last week, on the statistics of marriage and divorce in the United States from 1867 to 1886 inclusive,” with following: In 1870 Utah had highest rate of divorce out of all states and territories. In 1870 Utah’s rate was one divorce per 185 marriages. National averages was 1:664. States with lowest divorce rates are South Carolina at 1:4,938, Delaware at 1:123,672, New Mexico at 1:16,077, North Carolina at 1:4,938, and Louisiana at 1:4,579. In 1880 Utah had tenth highest rate of divorce out of all states and territories. In 1880 Utah’s rate was one divorce per 219 marriages, wich was more than twice the national average of 1:479. In twentieth century, divorce rates for LDS temple marriages starts out three times higher than this “divorce mill” rate for early Utah civil marriages.

13 Mar, 1890 – Plural wife writes to her husband: “We are more like lovers than husband and wife for we are as far removed from each other – there is always the embarrassment of lovers and yet we have been married more than 37 years.”

8 Sep, 1890 – Apostle John Henry Smith preaches from the pulput that “married people who indulge their passions for any other purpose than to beget children, really comitted adultery.”

1 Oct, 1890 – An apostle asks “how the Son of God was begotten,” and Lorenzo Snow tells apostles, “that he was begotten just the same as you and I were or as our sons today are.”

2 Dec, 1890 – Apostle Lorenzo Snow tells the Quorum of Twelve that “he expects to see the day when a man’s blood is shed again for the crime of adultery.”

24 Mar, 1891 – Utah’s chief justice Zane writes: “Polygamy has demoralized the people of Utah. I presume there are more sexual crimes here in proportion to the population than anywhere else.”

6 Mar, 1892 – Stake president “condemns the practice that existed among the Saints to some extent of taking means to restrict the number of their children to only two or three.”

20 Sep, 1896 – Seventy’s president J. Golden Kimball preaches: “There are 500 girls who are public prostitutes in Salt Lake City. Some of these are daughters of Latter-Day Saints.”

5 Nov, 1896 – Apostle Lorenzo R. Snow’s youngest plural wife bears his last child in Canada. At age 82 he is the oldest general authority to father a child.

15 Jan, 1897 – Apostle Brigham Young Jr. temporarily resigns as vice-president of Brigham Young Trust Co. because first counselor George Q. Cannon allows its property to become “a first class” brotherl on Commercial Street (now Regent Street), Salt Lake City. Apostle Heber J. Grant is invited to its opening reception and is stunned to discover himself inside “a regular whore-house.” This situation begins in 1891 and for fifty years church-owned and controled real estate companies lease houses of prostitution.

7 Oct, 1898 – At general conference Apostle John W. Taylor reports that in one rural area in Utah, 80 percent of LDS marrages involve pre-marital sex.

14 June, 1900 – First Presidency and apostles agree to give $3,600 to Brigham Y. Hampton for his prior “detective work” in which he paid prostitute to allow him and nearly thirty LDS “Home Missionaries” and policemen to spy on anti-Mormons engaging in sex acts in Salt Lake City brothels in 1885. Although first counselor denies it at this meeting, in private meetings of First Presidency George Q. Cannon refers to Hampton’s brothel work as “services rendered the Church” and “work in behalf of the Church.” Hampton has been set apart as a Salt Lake temple worker since 1893, and another coordinator of brothel spying is the temple doorkeeper (1893-1910).

10 July 1901 – Apostle Anthon H. Lund reports to apostles that during six-month period, 58 percent of LDS marriages in rural ward were “forced.”

7 Nov, 1901 – First Presidency decides and announces that there is “no rule in the church forbidding cousins to intermarry” and that first cousins can have temple marriages if they present civil license. General authorities such as Brigham Young, Williard Richards, Joseph F. Smith and Abraham H.Cannon married their first cousins as legal and plural wives.

23 Nov, 1902 – Apostle John W. Taylor tells stake priesthood meeting that “those who have sexual intercourse with their wives or touch any dead body are unclean until the evening, and therefore during that day should not enter the temple or officiate in any ordinances of the gospel.”

26 Mar 1903 – Joseph F. Smith tells apostles “there would be no daughters of perdition” in final judgment. General authorities authorize rebaptism without church discipline for young man who confesses “secret crime he committed in having to do with animals.”

7 July, 1903 – Apostle Rudger Clawson tells other apostles “that the practice of self-abuse existed to an alarming extent among the boys in our community who attended the district schools, and also, he doubted not, the church schools. He felt that the boys and girls should be properly instructed in regard to this evil.”

25 Oct, 1905 – Public criticism of Joseph F. Smith’s remarks that Father Damien of Hawaiian leper colony was immoral before his death. LDS church president is convinced that leprosy is contracted through sexual contact.

9 May, 1913 – First Presidency learns that James Dwyer, co-founder of Salt Lake City’s LDS University (now LDS Business College), has been “teaching young men that sodomy and kindred vices are not sins…” Dwyer’s daughter, actress Ada Dwyer Russell, is already in long-term relationship with lesbian poet Amy Lowell. Dwyer’s bishop and stake president want to excommunicate him, but First Presidency allows Dwyer, now in his eighties, to voluntarily “withdraw his name” from LDS church membership.

29 Sep, 1914 – Quorum of Twelve learns that mission president has “discovered that 15% of the missionary Elders in the Netherlands during the past two years, have been guilty of imoral practices, and that a much greater percentage of Elders have ben exposed to these evils.”

8 June, 1941 – First Councelor J. Reuben Clark tells annual general conference of youth and their leaders: “When I was a boy it was preached from the stand, and my father and my mother repeated the principle to me time and time again. They said, ‘Reuben, we had rather bury you than have you become uchaste.’ And that is the law of this true Church.”

26 Jan, 1842 – First Councelor J. Reuben Clark tells reporter for Look Magazine: “Our divorces are piling up.” Church Historian’s Office in 1968 compiles divorce statistics since 1910 for temple marriages, “church civil” marriages, and “other civil” marriages. Although temple marriages have lowest divorce rate of the three categories, in 1910 there was one “temple divorce” for every 66 temple marriages performed that year., 1:41 in 1915, 1:34 in 1920, 1:27 in 1925, 1:30 in 1930, 1:23 in 1935, 1:27 in 1939, 1:17 in 1945, 1:31 in 1950, 1:30 in 1955, 1:19 in 1960 and 1965. Last rate for temple divorce is almost ten times higher than Utah’s civil divorce rate century earlier.

2 Oct, 1952 – Second Counselor J. Reuben Clark warns women of Relief Society general conference against “self-pollution,” prostitution, and “homosexuality, which it is tragic to say, is found among both sexes.” He cautions LDS women against allowing homsexually oriented males to use them as male-substitutes in dating or marriage: “I wonder if you girls have ever reflected on the thought that was in the mind of the man who first began to praise you for your boyish figures.” Clark also tells the ladies, “I forebear to more than mention that abomination and filth and loathsomeness of the ancients – carnal knowledge with beasts.” Church Relief Society magazine publishes this talk in full.

21 May, 1959 – Executive committee of Church Board of Education discusses “the growing problem in our society of homosexuality.” Spencer W. Kimball reports that David O.McKay has said “that in his view homosexuality was worse than heterosexual imorality; that it is a filthy and unnatural habit.”

12 Feb, 1964 – First Presidency letter that all prosepctive missionaries “found guilty of fornication, of sex perversion, of heavy petting, or of comparable transgressions should not be recommended until the case has been discussed with the bishop and stake president and the visiting General Authority.”

7 Jan, 1969 – First Presidency secretary Joseph Anderson answers letter about “the Church’s stand pertaining to birth control,” with the concluding statement: “After all, however, the bretheren recognize that this is a personal matter involving the individuals concerned, and concerning which they must make their own decision.”

14 April, 1969 – First Presidency makes official statement on birth control which omits any reference to their own feelings about birth control as “a personal matter,” and states: “We believe that those who practice birth control will reap dissapointment by and by,” and repeated earlier letter’s emphasis on “self control as a dominant factor” in marriage.

9 June, 1978 – First Presidency letter instructs that interviews of married persons “should scrupulously avoid indelicate inquiries,” yet also emphasizes: “Married persons should understand that if in their marital relations they are guilty of unnatural, impure or unholy practices, they should not enter the temple unless and until they repent and discontinue any such pratices.” This reverses position of First Presidency proir to Spencer W. Kimball’s ascendancy.

17 June, 1978 – Church News headline “Interracial Marriage Discouraged” in same issue which announces authorizaton of priesthood for those of black African descent. Sources at church headquarters indicate that Apostle Mark E. Petersen requires this emphasis.

Sep 1981 – Branch presidents at the Missionary Training Center in Provo receive 21-point handout to help “both male and female” misionaries avoid masturbation. Point 19: “In very severe cases it may be necessary to tie a hand to the bed frame with a tie in order that the habit of masturbating in a semi-sleep condition can be broken.” In May 1995 article about masturbation, national magazine “Details” publishes seventeen of the recommendations and identifies Apostle Mark E. Petersen as author of “Steps in Overcoming Masturbations: A Guide to Self-Control.” In 1996, spokesman at LDS headquarters denies that Elder Petersen authored this document and denies that it was ever distributed.

5 Jan, 1982 – First Presidency repeats its 1978 instructions for “interviewing married persons,” but adds: “The First Presidency has interpreted oral sex as constituting an unnatural, impure or unholy practice.”

15 Oct 1982 – First Presidency instruction to all stake and mission leaders that many letters from church members “indicate clearly that some local leaders have been delving into private, sensitive matters beyond the scope of what is appropriate…. Also, you should never inquire into personal, intimate matters involving marital relations between a man and his wife.” Letter continues that even if a church member volunteers such intimate information, “you should not persue the mater but should merely suggest that if the member has enough anxiety about the propriety of the conduct to ask about it, the best course would be to discontinue it.” In response to widespread complaints from married couples being asked if they have oral sex, this returns First Presidency stance to what it was prior to presidency of Spencer W. Kimball, now incapacitated.

4 Mar, 1983 – Salt Lake Tribune reports lawsuit filed in February against LDS church for $28 million. A father blames LDS bishop for contributing to his sixteen-year-old son’s suicide for conseling his son “that masturbation is a terrible sin.. and being a normal adolescent in the puberty state, KIP ELIASON became increasingly less able to reconcile his sexual desires with the strict doctrines of the said LDS Church. He became filled with self-hate.”

15 Apr, 1983 – “University Post: The Unofficial Newspaper of Brigham Young University” reports interview with director of Standards Department. He acknowledges that students suspected of cheating, illegal drug use, stealing, or homosexuality are expelled from BYU if they refuse to take polygraph examination. BYU Security has licensed polygraph examiner.

4 Apr, 1987 – First Counselor Gordon B. Hinckley tells priesthood session of general conference that “marriage should not be viewed as a therapeutic step to solve problems such as homosexual inclinations or practices…” This reverses decades-long church policy formulated by Spencer W. Kimball.

9 Aug 1991 – Salt Lake Tribune article, “Of LDS Women, 58% Admit Premarital Sex.”

Parallels between recent abuse cases are disturbing!


Parallels between recent abuse cases are disturbing

SNAP: The parallels between recent sex abuse cases are disturbing
Statement by Barbara Dorris, Outreach Director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (moc.liamgnull@sirrodPANS, 314-503-0003)

The parallels that can be drawn between the scandal at the Citadel and the situation at Penn State are disturbing.

At both institutions, a man in a position of authority and influence used his status to approach, groom, and ultimately molest young boys. At both institutions, reports were made to the predator’s superiors that something wrong was happening. And at both institutions, these superiors failed to act. Through their efforts to protect the name and reputations of their respective institutions, officials at PSU and the Citadel allowed more children to be victimized.

What is most disturbing about these scandals, however, is that they are not new or unheard of. Rather, these are a recent reiteration of the same type of cover-up that has plagued other organizations that held their reputations above the safety of children; institutions like the Boy Scouts of America, the Church of Latter Day Saints, and to a much greater extent, the Catholic Church.

What is different about PSU and the Citadel, however, is that the outside reaction – from parents, alumni, community members, and the media – has been visceral. These people have rightly been outraged, and heads have rolled because of their public outcry.

Yet we see no such outcry with the church. On the contrary, people have jumped to defend the priests that have been accused of molesting young boys and girls, and moved quickly to attempt to discredit those who came forward, citing misnomers as “this abuse occurred so long ago, get over it,” “you’re in it for the money, “and “if you were actually abused, what took you so long to come forward?”

The issue with this type of reaction is not only that it is mean-spirited, but it deters others who may have seen or suspected clergy abuse from coming forward, and it deters the type of public outrage that have shamed PSU and the Citadel, and therefore, the repercussions that come with it.

So we applaud the reaction from community members and share in their outrage at the officials at the Citadel. Through their inaction, they allowed this predator to change hunting grounds – moving from the university to a local high school – and avoid responsibility, in the same way that the Catholic church has done for so long. We hope that a full investigation is launched in order to determine who knew what, and when exactly they knew it, and we urge that this investigation be undertaken by outside authorities. We also call on Citadel President John Rosa to do real outreach, and do everything within his power to beg others who may have been victimized or seen these crimes occur to come forward, get help, start healing, and tell their story.

(SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, is the world’s oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims. Founded in 1988, we now have more than 10,000 members. Despite the word “priest” in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, and Protestant ministers. Our website is SNAPnetwork.org)

Contact David Clohessy (314-566-9790 cell, moc.loanull@ysseholcPANS), Barbara Blaine (312-399-4747, moc.liamgnull@enialbPANS), Barbara Dorris (314-862-7688 home, 314-503-0003 cell, moc.liamgnull@sirrodPANS)

The Citadel faces abuse scandal similar to Penn State’s
There’s a story unfolding in Charleston, S.C., that sounds depressingly similar to the scandal that has rocked Penn State University.
Officials at The Citadel, “the military college of South Carolina,” are admitting they did not do enough after learning that a man in custody in Mount Pleasant, S.C., who has been accused of sexually abusing at least five boys in recent years, was brought to the school’s attention in 2007. Then, school officials were told, he had engaged in inappropriate sexual activities with boys during a summer camp at the college in 2002. An internal investigation was done, but police were never informed.

“As an institution responsible for delivering tomorrow’s leaders, we hold The Citadel to a higher standard,” Citadel President Gen. John Rosa said Monday. “We tell cadets to go beyond enforcing rules – to do what’s right. We are confronted with an investigation from 2007 in which I do not believe we met that standard.”
The school has retained outside consultants “to review the procedures that the college followed in this matter and recommend how we can improve our capacity to protect those living, learning, and working at The Citadel,” Rosa added.
Louis “Skip” ReVille, 32, a Citadel alum, is accused of sexually abusing boys he coached in Mount Pleasant. In 2007, as Charleston’s Post and Courier reports, Citadel officials were told by a suspected victim that five years earlier ReVille had invited him and other boys to a dorm room on campus. ReVille, the boy said, showed them pornography and encouraged them to masturbate. The boy was 14 years old at the time.
ReVille went on to become a school principal and coach in Mount Pleasant. Local WCSC-TV reports that investigators say he now has “confessed to charges he sexually molested teen boys, aged 13 to 15.”
At Penn State, former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky has been accused of sexually abusing at least eight boys over more than a decade, sometimes on campus. And school officials have been accused of not informing authorities, even though they had been warned by witnesses of Sandusky’s alleged crimes. Sandusky says he’s innocent.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/11/15/142349930/the-citadel-faces-abuse-scandal-similar-to-penn-states?ps=rs

Barbara Dorris
Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests

Honor disgraced Phoenix bishop O’Brien? Please speak up!


Honor disgraced Phoenix bishop O’Brien? Please speak up!

Dear Friends;

If you have a moment sometime today, would you please take a couple of minutes and leave a comment on the following article, or write a letter to the editor? This is an opportunity for you to educate people about clergy abuse, especially those that have never dealt with the subject. You do not have to be an expert, just write what you feel.

Thanks!

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2011/11/15/20111115montini1116-bishop-does-not-deserve-honor.html

SNAP opposes the honoring of O’Brien

Statement by Barbara Dorris, Outreach Director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (moc.liamgnull@sirrodPANS, 314-503-0003)
We are disappointed and shocked that an organization like the Catholic Community Foundation would choose to honor a man who has repeatedly endangered children and whose irresponsible actions led to the death of an innocent man.

O’Brien is not a “Man of Faith.” He is a man of cover-up, excuses and crimes against the innocent. We beg the CCF to rescind this honor and instead look to honor the innocent who were so horribly hurt under his reign

(SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, is the world’s oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims. Founded in 1988, we now have more than 10,000 members. Despite the word “priest” in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, and Protestant ministers. Our website is SNAPnetwork.org)

Contact David Clohessy (314-566-9790 cell, moc.loanull@ysseholcPANS), Barbara Blaine (312-399-4747, moc.liamgnull@enialbPANS), Barbara Dorris (314-862-7688 home, 314-503-0003 cell, moc.liamgnull@sirrodPANS)

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2011/11/15/20111115montini1116-bishop-does-not-deserve-honor.html#ixzz1duVp6UgH

Disgraced bishop does not deserve an honor

Vince Watson and his wife used to attend the Catholic Community Foundation’s big yearly fundraising event called the Crozier Gala. That stopped after their son was sexually abused by a local priest named George Bredemann and they found out that Bredemann and other pedophiles had been shuffled around the diocese by then-Bishop Thomas J. O’Brien.

“I haven’t been able to return to the church of my youth since then,” Watson told me. “And while we haven’t gone to the gala in some time, I guess we’re still on a mailing list so we got an invitation for the 2012 gala and … honestly … I just couldn’t believe it.”

Among three individuals being honored at next year’s April 14 gala, with a theme of “A centennial of service and a future of abundance,” is Bishop O’Brien.

He is listed as the event’s “faith” honoree.

“It’s just astonishing that they would do this,” Watson said. “So many young people were harmed. And instead of protecting them, he (O’Brien) protected his priests. And they want to honor him for ‘faith’? Seriously?”

Back in 2003, Bishop O’Brien signed an agreement with then-Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley that granted O’Brien immunity from criminal charges if he acknowledged that he had exposed children to harm and agreed to a series of policy changes within the diocese.

Not too long after that, O’Brien was arrested on charges of leaving the scene of a car accident after his vehicle struck and killed a pedestrian, a crime for which he ended up doing community service.

“With all of the wonderful, well-meaning and dedicated servants of the Lord, couldn’t the church come up with better than this shell of a man?” Watson asked.

I put that same question to the Catholic Community Foundation’s Brigitte Dayton, vice president of marketing and program development.

“There have not been any complaints (about deciding to honor O’Brien),” Dayton told me. “The selection is made by our volunteers, including the board of directors and chairman of the gala and the Crozier Gala committee.”

She said the award for “faith” is given to someone who has had an impact on the community with their commitment to the faith.

(The other two honorees are Sharon Harper and Joe Garagiola.)

“But O’Brien? Unbelievable,” said Watson.

His son was 11 when he was molested by Bredemann, who is now in prison.
“My son was a great student, a brilliant kid, but this experience has cost him years of his life,” Watson said. “Only now as an adult is he coming to grips with what happened to him and making his way. And there were many like him. I’m not saying that you continue to go after O’Brien or anything like that. But honoring him? Really, what are they thinking?”

Former County Attorney Romley agreed.

“Is our memory that bad?” he said. “As a Catholic myself, I must say, this disgusts me. It’s not about continuing to persecute O’Brien. He’s fulfilled his obligation to society. But honoring him? Come on.”

The foundation sent me a written statement explaining its decision. It reads in part:

“As one of three named event honorees, Bishop Thomas O’Brien … is being recognized specifically for having had the foresight 27 years ago to create the foundation. … Two years later, in 1985, Bishop O’Brien also launched the Crozier Gala. … To date, the Crozier Gala has raised over $5 million dollars in support of the foundation’s grant-making programs. Since inception, the foundation has granted more than $20 million to worthy nonprofit organizations.”

No one doubts the good done by the foundation.

But that doesn’t diminish the horror inflicted on innocent children under O’Brien’s watch. Or how he handled the priests inflicting that harm.

At the very least the foundation should have considered the possible negative impact that deciding to honor O’Brien would have on the abuse victims and their families.

“Honoring O’Brien is a kick in the teeth to families like ours and to all good Catholics,” Watson said. “I thought that after I talked to you and you called the foundation to ask them about this, they would change their mind and honor someone else. But I know they won’t. After all these years and all the harm that was done, they still don’t get it, do they?”

No.

Barbara Dorris
Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests

Monastery offers ‘regret’ about sex charge


ASPEN — The abbot of St. Benedict’s Monastery in Old Snowmass issued a statement Thursday regarding allegations that a former monk-in-training sexually assaulted an adolescent boy in the early part of last decade.

And in a related development Thursday, Chief Deputy District Attorney Arnold Mordkin filed one count of sexual assault on a child — position of trust — pattern of abuse, against 72-year-old suspect Wilfred Laurent Carignan.

“The monks and I very much regret the situation regarding Wilfred Carignan and we are praying for everyone involved,” said Father Joseph Boyle in a prepared statement. “None of the accusations against Carignan are connected with the time he spent at St. Benedict’s Abbey. We are committed to doing everything we can to prevent sexual abuse and exploitation of minors and pray for all victims and their families.”

Carignan worked at the monastery from 1996 to 2001. He was the facility’s beekeeper and was not accepted as a monk, a position for which he was training. Law enforcement officials say he sexually assaulted a boy, believed to be aged 10 or 11 at the time, at his home near the monastery.

“… on or between January 1, 2001 and July 10, 2003 … Wilfred Laurent Carignan unlawfully, feloniously, and knowingly subjected [the alleged victim] … to sexual contact and the victim was less than eighteen years of the age and the defendant was in a position of trust with respect to the victim,” Mordkin’s charge says.

Carignan currently is incarcerated in the Fremont Correctional Facility in Canon City on two felony convictions of sexual assault of a child. He was arrested in California in February 2008, following the issuance of a warrant in 2003 out of Delta County, according to court records.

He had been wanted for molesting boys between the ages of 8 and 18 years old in the Hotchkiss area. Carignan was convicted on two counts of sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to separate prison sentences of six and eight years to life in state prison in September 2008. He is eligible for parole on Aug. 29, 2016, according to records from the Department of Corrections.

On April 6, Carignan, while in custody, was detained and advised of his rights concerning the Pitkin County charge. He is scheduled to appear in court in Aspen Monday to face the new charge.

He faces four to 12 years in the Department of Corrections if convicted. There is no statute of limitations in the state of Colorado for sex offenses against children.

Catholic Church Evades Sex Charges in South Dakota, Sexual Abuse Lawsuits Filed!


(WOMENSENEWS)–”When the nuns wanted you at night, they’d come get you from the dorm,” recalled Mary Jane Wanna Drum, 64, who as a young child lived at one of South Dakota’s several Catholic-run boarding schools for Native American children.

“My older sister would tell them I had an earache. ‘Take me,’ she’d say. It wasn’t until this year, when my siblings and I began talking about all this, that I realized she protected me whenever she could. How do I thank her for that?” asked Drum.

The sexual abuse suffered by Drum and her seven brothers and sisters as grade-school students was both continual and depraved. In a phone interview, she recalled nuns, priests and lay employees subjecting both boys and girls to a barrage of violent assaults and bizarre molestations. Among many examples, the mother superior forced girls to simulate sex acts with a large doll before abusing them herself. Priests raped boys and girls, and the priest in charge also placed girls as “foster children” with single men.

“Whoever paid,” said Drum. “I don’t know how any of us are alive today.”

Students rarely received treatment for injuries, including those resulting from savage beatings or caused when children were sexually penetrated, said one of their attorneys, Rebecca Rhoades, of Manly and Stewart, a national firm headquartered in Newport Beach, Calif.
“We found no records of doctor visits at any of the boarding schools. This was all kept very quiet,” Rhoades said.

Attendance at Drum’s school, Tekakwitha Orphanage, was compulsory for the children of her tribe, Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate, whose reservation straddles North and South Dakota. The youngsters were hardly orphans, but had been taken from their families as infants and young children.
“Our parents and grandparents weren’t allowed on the property, so they’d sit across the road from sunrise to sunset–on blankets or on their cars–trying to get a glimpse of us,” said Drum. “I used to cry at a window, hoping they’d see me.”

Drum and her siblings have now filed childhood-sexual-abuse lawsuits against the Catholic Diocese of Sioux Falls and other Catholic Church entities that provided the orphanage’s staff and supervision. (During the 1970s, most of the institutions were transferred to the tribes or closed down.)

Rhoades’ law firm is part of a team that recently completed negotiations for a settlement with the Society of Jesus, or Jesuits, on behalf of clients who were abused at the order’s schools in the Northwest and Alaska. The result: about 400 Native people and 100 others will receive $166.1 million. In South Dakota, 77 plaintiffs have complaints in various stages concerning abuse at a half-dozen boarding schools. Some, like Drum’s, are in an early phase while others have already been before judges, said Rhoades. On March 18, Drum was dismayed to learn that a South Dakota court had dismissed 18 plaintiffs’ suits.

Nearly half the South Dakota plaintiffs are women, a much higher proportion of abused females than the Catholic Church claims is typical for its institutions as a whole. In 2002, dioceses nationwide self-reported that just 19 percent of molested children were girls. However, the church requested information only on priests and deacons, not on nuns, lay employees and others, which may have skewed the data.

“The church also takes sexual abuse of girls less seriously, so may not record it,” said David G. Clohessy, director of the Chicago-based Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests. “There isn’t any good, independent data. From our experience as a support group, though, I’d say the South Dakota proportion is likely an accurate representation.”

Catholics lead the way on same-sex marriage!


The Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that same-sex marriage is supported by 53 percent of those surveyed. That’s amazing. For the first time in the poll’s history, the level of support for marriage equality cracked 50 percent. For the first time, a majority of men (53 percent) say yes to allowing gays to wed. But what’s truly historic is where white Catholics are on this issue.

The question was straightforward: “Do you think it should be illegal or legal for gay and lesbian couples to get married?” In February 2010, an astounding 55 percent of white Catholics said “legal.” In the current poll, the number jumped 8 points to 63 percent. This Post-ABC News poll corresponds with a Gallup poll I gasped at in June 2010. That survey showed that Catholics (62 percent) and men (53 percent) were leading the charge on acceptance of same-sex marriage, which was supported by 52 percent of all surveyed.

This doesn’t come as a surprise to Phil Attey, executive director of Catholics for Equality, who alerted me to this interesting nugget in the Post-ABC News polling data. “American Catholics consistently poll higher on progressive social justice issues — including the freedom to marry for all,” he said. “Our Catholic faith tradition is strongly based on social justice and our duty to take care of those who are unjustly oppressed and marginalized.” He went on to say, “Our families have already dealt with this issue at a personal level, and Catholics largely base their moral understanding of the world through their personal relationships, not by the dictates of institutional forces, be they from our church hierarchy in Rome or conservative political groups. We see healthy, happy gay and lesbian families within our families, parishes and communities, and we know love and commitment when we see it.”

May these latest poll results help the nascent and long-term effort in Congress to repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act. It won’t happen overnight, and it won’t be easy. But with more and more Americans siding with equality, there should be no fear of doing what is right.

By Jonathan Capehart | 10:03 AM ET, 03/21/2011

U.S. Catholic Bishops say Obama’s Refusal to Defend DOMA is an ‘Alarming and Grave Injustice,’ When are Catholic Priest going to stop abusing young boys and girls?


“Our nation and government have the duty to recognize and protect marriage, not tamper with and redefine it, nor to caricature the deeply held beliefs of so many citizens as ‘discrimination,’” said Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB).

 

His statement followed the February 23 announcement that President Obama has instructed the Department of Justice to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a move Archbishop Dolan called an “alarming and grave injustice.”
           
Archbishop Dolan’s full statement follows:

The announcement on February 23 that the President has instructed the Department of Justice to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is an alarming and grave injustice. Marriage, the union of one man and one woman as husband and wife, is a singular and irreplaceable institution. Only a man and a woman are capable of the “two-in-one-flesh” union of husband and wife. Only a man and a woman have the ability to bring children into the world. Along with that ability comes responsibility, which society historically reinforces with laws that bind mothers and fathers to each other and their children. This family unit represents the most basic and vital cell of any society, protecting the right of children to know and be known by, to love and be loved by, their mother and father. Thus, marriage represents the bedrock of the common good of society, its very foundation and future.

Contrary to the Attorney General’s statement, DOMA does not single out people based on sexual “orientation” or inclination. Every person deserves to be treated with justice, compassion, and respect, a proposition of natural law and American law that we as Catholics vigorously promote. Unjust discrimination against any person is always wrong. But DOMA is not “unjust discrimination”; rather, it merely affirms and protects the time-tested and unalterable meaning of marriage. The suggestion that this definition amounts to “discrimination” is grossly false and represents an affront to millions of citizens in this country.

The decision also does not stand the test of common sense. It is hardly “discrimination” to say that a husband and a wife have a unique and singular relationship that two persons of the same sex–or any unmarried persons–simply do not and cannot have. Nor is it “discrimination” to believe that the union of husband and wife has a distinctive and exclusive significance worthy of promotion and protection by the state. It is not “discrimination” to say that having both a mother and a father matters to and benefits a child. Nor is it “discrimination” to say that the state has more than zero interest in ensuring that children will be intimately connected with and raised by their mother and father.

Protecting the definition of marriage is not merely permissible, but actually necessary as a matter of justice. Having laws that affirm the vital importance of mothers and fathers–laws that reinforce, rather than undermine, the ideal that children should be raised by their own mother and father–is essential for any just society. Those laws serve not only the good of the spouses and their children, but the common good. Those laws are now under relentless attack. If we forget the meaning of marriage, we forget what it means to be a human person, what it means to be a man or a woman. Have we wandered away so far in our society as to forget why men and women matter, and eroded the most central institution for our children and for our future?

The Administration’s current position is not only a grave threat to marriage, but to religious liberty and the integrity of our democracy as well. Our nation and government have the duty to recognize and protect marriage, not tamper with and redefine it, nor to caricature the deeply held beliefs of so many citizens as “discrimination.” On behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, I express my deep disappointment over the Administration’s recent decision. I have written of these concerns to the President in separate correspondence, and I pray that he and the Department of Justice may yet make the right choice to carry out their constitutional responsibility, defending the irreplaceable institution of marriage, and in so doing protect the future generations of our children.

Philadelphia Priests Sexual Abuse & Cover-Up Scandal!


KYFebruary 11, 2011 by Frank Michaels  

W-TV the CBS affiliate from Philadelphia reports that three priests and a Philadelphia school teacher have been arrested and charged with raping two boys over a several year period.

An additional fifth man, a monsignor has also been charged with child endangerment for allegedly allowing the four to continue with the abuse without taking measures to stop it.

Edward Avery 68, Charles Engelhardt 64, James Brennan 47, and parochial school teacher Bernard Shero 48 have all been charged with rape, indecent sexual assault and additional criminal charges.

Monsignor William Lynn 60, who is the secretary for clergy for the Archdiocese of Philadelphia under Cardinal Anthony Vevilacqua has also been charged on two counts of endangering the welfare of a child

Pope calls his cardinals to Rome for sex-abuse summit! What next?


Tuesday, 9 November 2010

The Pope has summoned the world’s cardinals, including Ireland’s Sean Brady, to Rome next week for a summit meeting to respond to the clerical child sex abuse crisis.

This will be the first time that Pope Benedict XVI has placed the abuse scandals, that have rocked the Catholic Church, for consideration by a summit of 203 cardinals.

But the unprecedented move was received sceptically by victims of paedophile clerics who claimed that most cardinals have poor records in dealing with abuse cases.

Dublin victim Andrew Madden, author of ‘Altar Boy, A Story of Life After Abuse’, said: “If the talks are anything like the Irish bishops’ visit to Rome earlier this year, they will amount to nothing.”

The head of a victims’ group in America said the proof would be, not in the discussion but, in the results.

“To be swayed by mere talk is to betray vulnerable children and wounded adults,” said Barbara Blaine of Chicago, president of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests.

The summit of cardinals will convene a week before the first anniversary of the shocking report of the Murphy Commission which revealed hundreds of cases of child sex abuse by the clergy in the archdiocese of Dublin, as well as systematic cover-ups by church leaders over several decades.

Expected to emerge from the discussions will be further details of a special probe by outside church leaders, ordered by Pope Benedict, into the four main archdioceses in Ireland of Armagh, Dublin, Cashel and Tuam.

Earlier this year, the crisis spread to the Pope’s native Germany, as well as Belgium, Austria, and the Netherlands which replicated cover-ups in Africa and Latin America.

Described as a “day of reflection and prayer”, the talks are scheduled to take place at the Vatican’s synod hall on Friday, November 19.

Cardinal William Levada, the American who heads the Vatican office in charge of drawing up policy to fight abuse, will head the discussion of “the church’s response to cases of sex abuse”, the Vatican said.

These talks will be held on the eve of an expansion by Pope Benedict of the college of cardinals on Saturday, November 20, when he confers Red Hats on 24 new Princes of the Church.

The abuse talks will also cover other major issues facing the Catholic Church, including the procedure for admitting five Anglican bishops disaffected by the Church of England’s acceptance of women priests and homosexual clergy.

Other issues to be discussed include threats to religious freedom, especially in the Middle East, and relations with other religions.

Terence McKiernan, president of the Boston-based BishopsAccountability.org called on the cardinals to issue a comprehensive statement addressing their own failings and outlining better policies for the future.

Mr McKiernan said progress had been made on sexual abuse and cover-up in the Catholic Church because of investigations and prosecutions by civil authorities.

“Yet Cardinal Sean Brady, the Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland, continues to reject calls that he resign, despite his failure in 1975 to report Rev Brendan Smyth to civil authorities,” he added. “As a result of Brady’s inaction, Smyth abused hundreds of children in Ireland and the United States over the next 20 years.”

Mr McKiernan added: “The Vatican itself impeded the previous investigation of the Archdiocese of Dublin.”