Archive for AIDS

Vatican Christmas Shocker! Pope says child rape isn’t that bad, was normal back in his day!


Victims of clerical sex abuse have reacted furiously to Pope Benedict’s claim yesterday that paedophilia wasn’t considered an “absolute evil” as recently as the 1970s.

In his traditional Christmas address yesterday to cardinals and officials working in Rome, Pope Benedict XVI also claimed that child pornography was increasingly considered “normal” by society.

“In the 1970s, paedophilia was theorised as something fully in conformity with man and even with children,” the Pope said.

“It was maintained – even within the realm of Catholic theology – that there is no such thing as evil in itself or good in itself. There is only a ‘better than’ and a ‘worse than’. Nothing is good or bad in itself.”

The Pope said abuse revelations in 2010 reached “an unimaginable dimension” which brought “humiliation” on the Church.

Asking how abuse exploded within the Church, the Pontiff called on senior clerics “to repair as much as possible the injustices that occurred” and to help victims heal through a better presentation of the Christian message.

“We cannot remain silent about the context of these times in which these events have come to light,” he said, citing the growth of child pornography “that seems in some way to be considered more and more normal by society” he said.

But outraged Dublin victim Andrew Madden last night insisted that child abuse was not considered normal in the company he kept.

Mr Madden accused the Pope of not knowing that child pornography was the viewing of images of children being sexually abused, and should be named as such.

He said: “That is not normal. I don’t know what company the Pope has been keeping for the past 50 years.”

Pope Benedict also said sex tourism in the Third World was “threatening an entire generation”.

Angry abuse victims in America last night said that while some Church officials have blamed the liberalism of the 1960s for the Church’s sex abuse scandals and cover-up catastrophes, Pope Benedict had come up with a new theory of blaming the 1970s.

“Catholics should be embarrassed to hear their Pope talk again and again about abuse while doing little or nothing to stop it and to mischaracterise this heinous crisis,” said Barbara Blaine, the head of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests,

“It is fundamentally disturbing to watch a brilliant man so conveniently misdiagnose a horrific scandal,” she added.

“The Pope insists on talking about a vague ‘broader context’ he can’t control, while ignoring the clear ‘broader context’ he can influence – the long-standing and unhealthy culture of a rigid, secretive, all-male Church hierarchy fixated on self-preservation at all costs. This is the ‘context’ that matters.”

The latest controversy comes as the German magazine Der Spiegel continues to investigate the Pope’s role in allowing a known paedophile priest to work with children in the early 1980s.

Black community paying the price for HIV/AIDS!


By: NNPA
NNPA
Originally posted 12/7/2010


With World AIDS Day having passed, black advocates say the deadly disease continues to inflict a staggering human and financial toll on the African American community.
The AIDS epidemic has claimed the lives of more than 230,000 African Americans during the past three decades. And although black Americans constitute just 12 percent of the U.S. population, they account for 46 percent of the 1.1 million Americans currently living with HIV.
To some observers, the fact that America hasn’t yet won the battle against AIDS boils down to pure economics.
”If we had large numbers of millionaires, billionaires and those impacting the economy dying of AIDS, I guarantee you a cure would be found virtually overnight,” says LaMont Evans, CEO of Healthy Black Communities Inc. in Atlanta.
”It’s sad to say,” Mr. Evans told BlackVoices, ”but there’s a lack of urgency in addressing this problem because those impacted are seen as disposable and not economically important.”
Whether one agrees with Mr. Evans, he may be on to something: Wealth and status indeed play a huge role in the likelihood of becoming infected with HIV in America.
In a first of its kind study on the link between economic status and HIV, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found in 2010 that those living in poor neighborhoods were more than four times more likely to be stricken with HIV, compared with the national average.
Researchers theorized that residents in poor areas had limited access to health care and other basic services, along with higher rates of substance abuse and incarceration – factors that heighten one’s risk for HIV.
”This study reveals a powerful link between poverty and HIV risk and a widespread HIV epidemic in America’s inner cities,” said Kevin Fenton, director of the CDC’s National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention. ”In this country, HIV clearly strikes the economically disadvantaged in a devastating way.”
So, if it’s clear that individuals in poor communities in general, and African Americans in particular, are being disproportionately ravaged by AIDS, what is being done to prevent the disease from spreading? Critics say not nearly enough.
Until this year, America had no comprehensive program to fight the AIDS epidemic. Then, in July 2010, President Obama launched the first National HIV/AIDS Strategy, designed to reduce the number of new HIV infections, increase access to care for people living with HIV, and reduce HIV-related disparities and health inequities.
For 2011, President Obama’s federal budget includes a $27.2 billion request for HIV and AIDS. That’s a 4.6 percent increase over 2010 funding, which totaled $26 billion.
But just three percent of the 2011 AIDS budget, or $900 million, is earmarked for prevention. Many AIDS advocates say this is completely insufficient, especially considering that one study conducted by the CDC and John Hopkins University showed that for every HIV infection prevented, $355,000 is saved in the costs of providing lifelong HIV care and treatment. The study concluded that an investment of $4.5 billion in HIV prevention during 10 years would save $104 billion in medical costs.
With relatively few dollars devoted toward prevention, it’s little wonder, perhaps, that every year, about 56,000 Americans are infected with HIV; 25,000 of them are African Americans.
The CDC says one in 22 African Americans is expected to get HIV during their lifetime. The CDC estimates that the chances of a black person being diagnosed with the AIDS virus is more than twice the risk for Hispanics and eight times that of whites.
For Hispanics, the odds of contracting HIV in one’s lifetime is one in 52; it’s one in 170 for whites. Meanwhile, Asian Americans had the lowest lifetime risk, at roughly one in 222.
In some parts of the country, namely the nation’s capital, the rate of HIV infection is particularly alarming. In 2009, a Washington Post story, citing CDC data, reported an HIV prevalence of at least 3 percent among individuals age 13 and above in the Washington D.C. area. That’s an infection rate similar to some parts of sub-Saharan Africa.

The Global AIDS Problem
And speaking of AIDS in Africa, the problem there isn’t getting any better either.
The worst-infected region of the world is sub-Saharan Africa, where approximately 22 million people are living with HIV, which is two-thirds of the 33 million people globally who are living with HIV.
Of the $27.2 billion federal AIDS budget requested by President Obama for 2011, $6.7 billion is allocated for global efforts to combat HIV/AIDS.
But federal AIDS funding is broken into two parts. A chunk of it – 47 percent or $12.9 billion – is mandatory, and must be spent on various entitlement programs. However, the majority of the AIDS budget – 53 percent or $14.3 billion – is discretionary, meaning Congress has to approve it through the appropriations process. That worries some people.
Federal funding for HIV/AIDS is already a tiny fraction – less than 1 percent – of the overall federal budget of the United States. And, with Republicans recently taking control of the House of Representatives, some observers fear what the GOP may do concerning AIDS spending – domestically and internationally.
The recent election results ”present at least three major challenges to the fight against AIDS,” Phill Wilson, president and CEO of the Black AIDS Institute, said in a statement. ”First, many of the strongest congressional AIDS champions will no longer occupy key leadership positions to advance an AIDS-friendly agenda,” Mr. Wilson said. ”Second, the new Republican majority campaigned on a platform of reducing federal spending on discretionary programs, such as the Ryan White CARE Act, the HIV prevention program at CDC, and substance abuse and mental health services for people living with HIV,” he added.
”Third, although it is unlikely that Republicans will be able to muster the votes needed to repeal health care reform, critics of health care reform may well seek to withhold the funding needed to implement key provisions of the legislation,” Mr. Wilson noted.
The Ryan White Program is the largest HIV-specific discretionary grant program in America. With $2.3 billion in funding requested for the program in 2011, the Ryan White Program is also the third largest source of funding for HIV care in the U.S.

Recent Promising Developments
The news about AIDS isn’t all doom and gloom. In fact, three recent promising developments in the fight against AIDS all emerged on the same day:
o A new research study showed that a daily pill now being sold in pharmacies nationwide could help prevent the spread of AIDS among gay and bisexual men. The pill is called Truvada and is marketed by Gilead Science. It was shown to reduce the risk of infection by anywhere from 44 percent to 73 percent.
o Likewise, AIDS advocates cheered the news that the number of HIV cases has dropped significantly during the past decade. According to the United Nations, the total number of HIV cases worldwide fell by 20 percent in the last 10 years, and there are now 33 million people living with HIV.
o That news came the same day in which the Pope issued a statement saying condom use is acceptable in order to prevent the spread of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.
While the general population greeted these developments with great enthusiasm, the reaction in the black community was more tempered.
Mr. Evans, who is leading the efforts to organize National Black HIV/AIDS Awareness Day on February 7, 2011, questioned who would pay for the pricey drug Truvada. ”Will it be insurers or the government?” he asked, suggesting there’s ambiguity on whether or not members of poor and minority communities will have access to those pills.
The Truvada pills cost between $5,000 and $12,000 annually in the U.S. They sell for a tiny fraction of that – around $140 a year – in some poor countries that are selling generic versions of the pill.
In America, AIDS patients with good health care coverage can get anti-retroviral treatment. But those who are uninsured or under insured typically have to go without or resort to public programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and the Ryan White Program.
With funding for those programs subject to Congressional approval, many AIDS prevention advocates worry that the battle against this deadly disease is far from over.
The high rate of HIV infection among African Americans is ”compelling proof that you get what you pay for, or that you don’t get what you fail to pay for,” says Mr. Wilson of the Black AIDS Institute, adding, ”We simply won’t be able to turn the epidemic around in black communities without stronger federal support for HIV prevention.”

The downside of ‘friends with benefits’


By Elizabeth Cohen, CNN senior medical correspondent

(CNN) — When Jennifer Nicholas sees television shows or movies where characters “hook up” or have sex with “friends with benefits,” she cringes, because that’s how she got herpes.

“Getting an STD wasn’t even something that crossed my mind,” said Nicholas, 39, who learned that she had herpes at age 22. “One day I’m at the doctor’s office and it was, ‘Surprise! You’ve got herpes.’ ”

Experts in sexually transmitted diseases say they’ve become increasingly concerned about the trend toward having what they call “sexual involvement in nonromantic contexts” — the technical term for hookups or “friends with benefits” — because they’re especially likely to spread sexually transmitted diseases.

The concern is that that people who have nonromantic relationships tend to have several partners at one time — “concurrency,” in sexual behavior lingo — in contrast to people engaged in romantic relationships, who tend to be monogamous for the duration of the romance.

“We’re concerned that concurrency is speeding up the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases,” said Tony Paik, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Iowa who recently published a study on the subject.

“This is a direct route for spreading STDs. There are important implications here for public health,” he added.

In Paik’s study, published last month in the journal Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, he found that 17 percent of men and 5 percent of women had at some point had more than one sexual partner at a time. Seventeen percent of women and 8 percent of men said they’d been exclusive but their partner had not.

For both genders, having sex with a friend made someone less likely to be monogamous.

“Sex with the ex”

Peggy Giordano, a professor of sociology at Bowling Green State University, studies the sexual behavior of young people, and she’s also concerned about the phenomenon of having sex in nonromantic ways.

“It seems more acceptable now to have nonromantic sexual encounters,” said Giordano, who’s studied the sex lives of 1,300 teens and young adults in Lucas County, Ohio. “When there’s no romance, there’s no basis for demanding fidelity from the other person.”

She says it’s not just the number of partners at one time; it’s that people’s behavior seems to be different when they’re having “friendly” sex in contrast to romantic sex.

When people have sex with a friend, they tend to be more trusting that the person doesn’t have a sexually transmitted disease and therefore fail to use a condom, she says.

“If you’ve known a person for a while, you don’t have that vigilance. You’re probably not going to ask them to go and get tested for STDs,” Giordano said. (To find out whether you should get a test for an STD, you can take this quiz.)

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can help you find a testing site near you.

This lack of vigilance about STDs is especially true when the sexual partner is a former boyfriend or girlfriend, she adds.

“We’re finding that ‘sex with the ex’ is a very common experience,” said Giordano, who’s been studying the group of Ohio youth since 2001.

“It’s seemingly safe, since they used to be your girlfriend or boyfriend. But of course you don’t know what they’ve done since you broke up. You don’t know their full portfolio of partners,” she said.

What are the chances?

Through her work with the Atlanta H Club, a social and support group for adults with herpes or the human papillomavirus, Nicholas is now more aware of the chances that a prospective partner could have a sexually transmitted disease.

It’s impossible to say precisely what the chances are you’ll catch an STD from any one person, but there are studies that can give you a clue. One important factor to keep in mind: For biological reasons, women are more likely to catch an STD from a man than vice versa.

Human papillomavirus

HPV is the most common sexually transmitted disease in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

About one in four U.S. females age 14 to 59 has HPV, according to a 2007 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The HPV rate was highest — 44 percent — for women ages 20 to 24.

HPV is not as common in men, according to a 2006 article in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, but is still “highly prevalent.” The study, which looked at 40 studies on HPV and men, found that 56 percent of the reports found that at least one in five men had HPV.

Herpes

Nearly one in five Americans has herpes simplex virus, according to a 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The rates for women were higher than for men: 23 percent, compared with 11 percent. Rates were especially high among African-Americans.

Gonorrhea

Your chances of getting gonorrhea from a sexual encounter are significantly lower than your chances of getting HPV or herpes. A 2007 study in the Annals of Internal Medicine showed a 0.24 percent prevalence rate. Rates were highest among teens but still less than 1 percent.

Chlamydia

Nearly half of the people in the above study who had gonorrhea also had chlamydia, but again, infection rates were significantly lower than for HPV and herpes.

According to a 2007 report in the Annals of Internal Medicine, 2.2 percent of Americans ages 14 to 39 had chlamydia. The rates were highest for teenage girls (4.6 percent) and for black women (7.2 percent).

Red Panties! This is the beginning of my story:1946 – 1986.


Red Panties represents the title of my memoir that I am writing these days and desire to have available for your reading pleasure soon. The memoir will cover the period of 1946 through 1986 and reveal the types of things that I went through being a Christian saved and sanctified with the gift of Holy Spirit speaking in tongues and a Sex Addict simultaneously.

This book will reveal how God in His mercy blessed me to overcome being sexually abused as a child, raped and molested. The book will show how God blessed me to transition from my childhood sexual tragedies to becoming a fully fledged sexual addict and finally receiving complete healing and deliverance by God Himself.

His Word says that “He sent His Word and healed them of all their destructions.” That is exactly what God did for me by blessing me to forgive and unconditionally love my father, brother and sister who were my abusers. You will say where my mother was – she worked three and four jobs to keep us from being hungry, homeless and helping my dad build a church.

I know my assignment is to uncover, expose and be one of the many catalysts to get people talking about the taboo of sex so that the spirit of shame, embarrassment and guilt is broken and bringing healing to those who desire help.

It is now time for others abused like me (male and female) to be able to confront our abusers and release ourselves from the bondage that has held so many in silences for too long. This is necessary even if the abuser claims to be innocent as I found out when I confronted my brother. I never did get to confront my father, but I have forgiven and love him unconditionally which the Lord blessed me to do rather than for me to go to hell with the hate that was in my heart for my father. My sister and I have reconciled and we chat periodically.

Only God could deliver me from sexual addiction since the world system does not believe you can be delivered.

Red Panties will be graphic to make the point for you to know that no matter how deep the sin and sinful behavior God delivers. Red Panties is actually the book that represents my behavior before I wrote “Don’t Say a Word About This! Exposing and Confronting Sexual Perversion!”

In Red Panties you will learn just how the Lord brought me out of sexual perversion and how he has given me the ability to help those who desire to be free totally in body, mind and soul from what I believe to be the most addictive behavior on the planet – sexual addiction.

Red Panties is written in a style that may offend some Christians and cause them to cringe at its candor and detail. This detail is written to let you know that I know what I am talking about and how I can help you that desire to be helped with love and understanding. The book is not about condemning anyone or character assassination, but rather exposing the truth as I experienced it.

God desires the best for all of us, but each individual needs to want to receive God and enjoy Gods best here on this planet. He will not make us do anything we do not want to do.

You will be able to order your copy of Red Panties soon.

Loren C. Due, Ph.D.
(970) 204 1559 Office
(970) 231 1511 Cell
(877) 373 8399 Toll Free
ten.eciffotsewqnull@eudrd

http://www.drdue.com

The Secret Epidemic as read on last night blog talk radio program hosted by me.


The Secret Epidemic by Karl Tipple


We hear in the mass media every day about the epidemics of AIDS, drug abuse, gang violence, domestic violence, poverty, and the death and human misery that these problems cause. There is one social ill of equally damaging proportions that society has so far refused to acknowledge: The sexual abuse of boys. It is well documented that as many as 1 of 3 girls is sexually abused before she reaches 16 ; what is still not widely known by the public and much of the psychiatric community is that as many as 1 in 5 boys are sexually abused before he reaches 16. This statistic was quoted from Matthew Parynik Mendel’s book “The Male Survivor: The Impact of Sexual Abuse.” The sexual abuse of boys, and of children in general, knows no economic, social, cultural or geographic boundaries. A major contributor to the problem is the prevailing shroud of myths that muddy the issue and allow perpetrators to continue their actions unabated. Some common myths include: “only men are sexual predators,” “boys are not harmed by sexual contact if it is by a woman,” “boys want such contact if it is by a woman,” and “if a boy is sexually abused, it is because he wanted it or asked for it.” As long as society clings to these and other commonly held mistaken beliefs, boys, men, their families, and society as a whole will continue to suffer.

Let’s look at some real facts:

1) If a boy under 18 is approached by an adult of either gender for sex, it is considered to be sexual abuse because of the age, and, therefore, perceived power differential between child and adult.

2) Sexual assault of boys by females – whether they be mothers, sisters, grandmothers, or other women – is grossly underreported. In his book “Abused Boys: The Neglected Victims of Sexual Abuse,” psychologist and therapist Mic Hunter stated that “women account for 20% of the [sexual] abuse of boys.”

3) Boys are harmed by having sexual contact with an adult of either gender. It causes psychological trauma and pain, as does any other form of assault. Loss of self-esteem, shame, guilt and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) are but a few of the consequences, according to Hunter, who deals with many male victims of childhood sexual abuse.

4) A little-known fact is that the sexual arousal that results from fondling or stroking a prepubescent boy’s genitals rapidly produces extreme pain, since he is incapable at that age of reaching an orgasm. Thus “fondling a boy’s genitals is in itself sexual torture,” said one pastoral counselor who wished to remain unnamed.

5) Children do not ask for or want sexual contact under normal circumstances. Even in the unlikely event that they were to invite such contact, it is the adult’s responsibility and obligation to refuse – as it is the adult who has the power in the relationship and is supposed to have mature judgment.

6) Sexual assaults on boys tend to be more violent and are more likely to result in serious physical injury or death than those perpetrated on females, according to N. Ellerstein and J. Canavan in their March 1980 article featured in “The American Journal of Diseases of Children.”

7) Men who were sexually abused as children are twice as likely to become substance abusers, commit suicide, be prone to illness, have problems in school, be antisocial or overly aggressive, and be verbally or physically abusive to their mates.

8) Ironically, only a small percentage of men abused as boys become pedophiles, said Hunter. However, an overwhelming percentage of pedophiles of either gender were sexually abused as children.

9) Because adults generally occupy positions of trust with children, any breach of that boundary is a breach of trust and an emotional abandonment, as well as an act of sexual assault.

10) Incest can occur on either emotional or physical levels, or both. Incest is defined as inappropriate sexualization of the relationship between a child and an adult entrusted with his care. Under this definition, sexual misconduct by teachers, ministers, or day care workers is also considered as incest.

11) Hunter also debunks the myth that all men who sexually abuse boys are homosexuals, commenting that many are heterosexuals who are not at all interested in sexual contact with other grown men, and that many pedophiles who abuse boys also abuse girls. Likewise most homosexuals are not pedophiles.

Because of the culture that exists in much of the world, men have additional constraints that impede their ability to cope with the aftermath of sexual abuse. Men are expected to be “macho,” to not feel sadness, to “always be in control,” to not under any circumstances be vulnerable. Males are also expected to be dominant in any sexual situation; to be otherwise is an affront to the idea of the male as the “stronger vessel,” the protector of women”. Thus, to be male and a victim of rape or molestation poses issues that most people refuse to deal with.

With these circumstances, men and boys who have been in any way sexually abused do not get the support and help that women have come to take for granted in the last two decades. Without the proper emotional support and validation to help them work through their feelings, many boys and men find less healthy ways of coping.

Older abused boys and men are more likely to act out violently, abuse alcohol or drugs, become sexually promiscuous, perhaps even commit rape or murder, in order to regain a feeling of control or power over their bodies and their lives. These factors are exacerbated by fears of being thought of as effeminate or homosexual because of the experience. “I didn’t want to talk about it [the abuse], because I was afraid that people would think I’m gay or that I molest kids” said Charles, an incest survivor.

Younger boys will often become bullies at school or on the playground, perform poorly at school, be socially withdrawn, lose their appetite, perhaps revert to earlier behaviors such as bedwetting. In some, the perceived loss of personal power is so complete that they themselves become the targets of bullies and/or further sexual predation. The tremendous loss of self-esteem, as well as the violation of trust, can and does cause an inability for the person to form intimate bonds with others from that point forward. This causes innumerable problems with work, social, and romantic relationships, as Hunter and many other therapists have commented.

One only needs to look in the hospitals, women’s shelters, courts, and the prison system to see the human toll that sexual abuse of boys has taken on society. The good news is that there are steps that we as a society can take to deal with these problems and lessen their impact on all parties involved.

There are several factors that contribute to the epidemic of sexual abuse of boys and of children in general. Perhaps the single largest contributor is secrecy – secrecy within families, schools, daycare facilities, churches, and other organizations, as well as secrecy maintained by witnesses of the abuse and by the victims themselves. Perpetrators will not tell others of their actions for obvious reasons. They often resort to threatening victims with violence, warning them that if they ever tell, they or their families and pets will be hurt or killed. Other normally responsible people who witness such abuse often don’t tell because they’re worried about the stigma that such a scandal will bring to the family or organization involved, or are afraid that authorities won’t properly handle the situation. Witnesses who tell and don’t get the needed assistance are themselves subject to harassment, violence, or ostracism. They will usually have to live with a situation long after police and other authorities have dropped the matter. Statistics published in 1992 and 1994 by the U.S. Department of Justice show that only 52% of rapes are reported, that one of two rape victims is under 18, and that one in six is under 12 years of age. Victims don’t talk for any number of reasons:

1) A deep sense of shame over what has happened. One survivor said “I felt non-human, like trash. I felt like I was somehow responsible, and that I didn’t deserve to go on living.”

2) Fears of revenge by the perpetrator and of ostracism by friends and family. “Some families are so sick and codependent that they will actually blame the child for the actions of an adult who molested him,” according to Sandy Poupenei, a marriage and family therapist.

3) Dissociation. This is a process that the mind uses to escape an unavoidable and intolerably painful situation. According to Rachel Downing, M.S.W., L.C.S.W., of the Sidran Traumatic Stress Foundation, “Dissociation is a complex mental process during which there is a change in a person’s consciousness which disturbs the normally connected functions of identity, memory, thoughts, feelings and experiences…” In other words, when a person dissociates during abuse, he may not consciously remember what happened. Obviously, one cannot report abuse that one does not remember clearly, or at all. It should be noted that just because a person has dissociated and cannot consciously remember part or all of an event, it does not mean that he is unaffected by the abuse. Indeed, this scenario is worse than a nondissociative case, because the victim’s lack of conscious awareness impedes recovery, according to experts on dissociative disorders.

On reading the report entitled “What are traumatic memories?” by Rachel Downing of the Sidran Traumatic Stress Foundation, one can justifiably conclude that if the person dissociated during the experience, then that shows that what happened was extremely traumatic. Until all the secrecy and cover-up is removed, sexual abuse of boys and the resulting consequences will continue unabated.

There are several actions that if taken may help to mitigate this problem. They are as follows:

1) Educate the public and dispel the myths that continue to interfere with the appropriate handling of this issue. Until people understand the true nature and scope of the problem, they will not be motivated or able to help.

2) Provide counseling support services specifically for men and boys who have been abused or assaulted. Early intervention of the right kind speeds recovery and lessens the damaging effects of abuse. Hunter stressed that those with strong support networks fare much better in their recovery than ones who are isolated emotionally.

3) Enact legislation that would provide the same legal consequences for rape of males and females. Some jurisdictions don’t recognize sexual assault of a male as rape.

4) Train law enforcement officers, counselors, teachers and clergy to recognize male victims of sexual abuse and how to handle such cases.

5) Parents should educate themselves about the signs and symptoms of abuse. This will help to alert them if their child is being harmed in a school, daycare, church, friends’ or neighbors’ homes, or in any other setting where they may not be able to accompany him.

6) Male victims need to become more vocal, and, when possible, form advocacy groups for mutual support and to educate others about sexual abuse and recovery issues.

Clearly, we as a society cannot afford to ignore this issue any longer. The costs of not dealing effectively with the recovery needs of victims and of not taking steps to prevent more abuse are too high to bear. Many people want to avoid any discussion regarding the sexual abuse of boys, finding it too uncomfortable, possibly because it shatters too many cherished beliefs. Regardless of whether people want to hear it, this is one secret that begs to be told.

C O G I C Abuse


Have you been to this site: www.reportcogicabuse.com ?

Check it out.

“Precious”


Precious

 

10 +

 

You got it – 10 +

 

It is so about time that the truth be told about incest in the black community; since I read 5 out of 300 books said they would not deal with us because we were like animals or we were not worth it to research about. That is what white people said about us in their books – on the subject of sexual abuse.

 

You want to know what I think, well here is a sample of what you are going to get in my new book about me – detailed events that will make some sick and others will be turned on by the explicit facts of all the sexual acts that God allowed me to live through to get complete and total deliverance and healing of sexual abuse.

 

My hat is off to Oprah Winfrey and Tyler Perry for having the guts to back a movie that illustrates the detail of this story about Claireece “Precious” Jones. For them to have shown what a young black woman endured in her home is remarkable. When they made it clear that her mother was her biggest enemy, it let me know that they were willing to pull off the gloves and spill their guts.

 

Claireece is exposed to:

           

            Rape and incest by her father

            Sexual Abuse by her mother

            Ridicule by the neighborhood kids

            The brunt of fat jokes

            Pandered by her mother

            Beat by her mother

            Thrown out of her high school

            Ignorance and Welfare Queen Syndrome by her mother

            A very kind and loving lesbian teacher in the alternative school

 

And it seemed as if she was exposed to much more – go see the movie for yourself if you can find it playing. We live in a 99.9 % white community and they have chosen not to bring the movie here; so we traveled to Denver to see it on a big screen.

 

If you don’t see another movie this year and if your denomination believes it is wrong to go to the movies you need to go to this movie if you are Afro-American or Black.

 

This movie is a true representation of what many blacks have had to live through to survive the system in America.

 

Don’t give me or anyone else any excuses why you can’t see this movie. Go now!

 

Loren C Due, Ph.D.

Transmission truths


When Michigan AIDS Coalition Executive Director Helen Hicks announced her thoughts about adopting an HIV-positive child to her friends, she was shocked at the response.

“Our friends thought we were insane, saying, ‘You’re going to bring this child into your house, and as cute as he or she may be, your whole family will become infected and you’re all going to die of AIDS,’” she recalled of the experience. “I have friends and I think that they’re educated – some of them have Master’s degrees in a variety of fields – but they don’t understand that it’s not true.”

And though Hicks and her husband ended up not adopting another child for unrelated reasons, the message of the experience stayed with her. Now, in her work at the MAC, combating myths about HIV transmission is something she deals with every day.

Toilet seats. Kissing. Sneezing. Handshakes.

The falsities so pervasive in the earlier years of the AIDS epidemic may seem, to some who are familiar with or have lost loved ones to the disease, like things of the past. However, HIV/AIDS activists are quick to correct that notion: Myths about HIV transmission are alive and well in 2009, and they still need to be addressed.

Prisoner fight and a neighborhood bite

Just recently, several cases of HIV transmission myths that persist in today’s society have come up in Michigan.

In Clinton Township, a man faces terrorism charges after allegedly biting his neighbor during a fight.

Daniel Allen, a 44-year-old HIV-positive man, is accused of biting his neighbor, Winfred Fernandis Jr., on the lip during a fight, the conditions of which are disputed by both sides. Allen was charged with aggravated assault and assault with intent to maim.

However, when news came to the surface that he is HIV positive, Macomb County Prosecutor Eric Smith announced that he would seek additional charges: possession or use of a harmful device, a terrorism law enacted after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. If convicted, Allen could face a 25-year felony sentence and a lifelong label as a terrorist.

Though there is a small chance that HIV can be transmitted through such a scenario, some HIV activists claim that the likelihood does not warrant such a sentence.

“This troubles me very much,” Lambda Legal HIV Project Director Bebe Anderson said of the case to the Michigan Messenger earlier this month. “I think it is a very dangerous thing for prosecution to proceed with a charge or an enhanced charge based on a person’s HIV status. Typically these prosecutions are based on ignorance about HIV transmission. These prosecutions add to ignorance in the general public about HIV transmission, and they certainly add to the stigmatization of people living with HIV.”

In the Michigan prison system, a similar fear of HIV transmission has kept HIV-positive prisoners from working in food service jobs. Though it was first announced that the policy was put in place to prevent HIV spread through food, the Michigan Department of Corrections later retracted that statement and held that the policy was to prevent violence against HIV-positive prisoners by other inmates.

In the case of the prison rule, the MDOC has said that they are working to change the policy.

As for Allen, the verdict remains to be seen – but the outlook is not good, as he faces precedent set by People v. Antoine Deshaw Odom, a case in which a Michigan prisoner infected with HIV and Hepatitis C was found guilty of the same terrorism charge after spitting at prison guards.

Pervasive myths

Beyond legal matters, HIV activists claim that misinformation about HIV transmission pervades every day work and life – from the case of Hicks’ possible adoption to situations encountered at AIDS agencies.

In one case, said Hicks, a baby shower held at a room MAC often rents out resulted in a complaint from an attendee. “One of the people who came to the shower asked me why we didn’t have toilet seat covers, because we were an AIDS organization, and really felt strongly that we needed to have that,” Hicks recalled.

In another case, an applicant for an administrative position at the non-profit withdrew her name because her husband was afraid of her contracting the disease while working there.

“I was so shocked,” Hicks commented. “You wouldn’t take a job because you think – your husband thinks you’re going to come home infected? It was beyond me.”

But fear is far-reaching – even as far as the family, in many cases of HIV.

Michelle Brown, who is on the board of the Michigan Women and AIDS Committee, relayed that she often hears of people being rejected by their friends and family after being diagnosed as HIV positive. “People have crazy ideas when they find out (others) have HIV,” she said. “One woman I talked to said that when she found out, she was no longer welcome at Thanksgiving dinner.”

And that, Brown added, makes some of the most heavily affected groups – such as African-American women – afraid to get tested and left in the dark about how they can and cannot become infected.

“People need to know that there is more than one way to get HIV,” she said, addressing the attitude toward “down low” men. “So to say ‘my man is straight’ or to think that any guy you see who is on the down low or maybe looks like he is, ‘If I stay away from him, I’m safe,’ you’re wrong.”

The Center for Disease Control recently released studies addressing that particular problem, suggesting that notions about the majority of transmissions within the black community coming from “down low” men are false.

“It is crucially important to bear in mind that there are a range of risk factors which face black women in the United States today,” National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention Director Kevin Fenton told National Public Radio in an October interview. “The reality is that bisexual black men account for a very, very small proportion of the over all black male population.”

Instead, Fenton said, black women are contracting HIV through intravenous drug use and sexual activity with infected partners who are not necessarily on the “down low.”

Making sure high-risk groups have correct information about HIV transmission, Fenton added, is one of the most important – and most difficult – parts of prevention. “It really is important that we understand why the infection is spreading and where the infection is spreading within the community, so we can take effective action,” he told NPR. “And part of the response must be to address some of the myths and misinformation regarding how HIV is being transmitted within the community.”

Taking action

Addressing the myths, HIV/AIDS activists agree, is crucial to prevention – and organizations like MAC are working hard to do just that.

A program that MAC uses is Positive Perspective, where “we send people living with HIV/AIDS to speak to the general population at any setting, at any time to tell the truth about the various ways in which HIV can, in fact, be contracted and the ways in which it cannot,” Hicks explained.

Unfortunately, like much of the government money for AIDS services, the state-funded Positive Perspective program is up to expire in February, leaving MAC and other agencies that utilize it to continue the funding in-house.

But funding is just one of the issues faced by HIV/AIDS activists.

Brown said that the Michigan Women and AIDS Committee has tried in vain to reach out to children in Detroit Public Schools about the disease, but has met only brick walls. Instead, the group is now hoping to bring young adults to the information in a non-school setting.

“We’re going to have a day at Cobo Hall where they’re going to bus in kids and we can show them everything,” she explained. “In schools, you don’t bring in condoms, you don’t try to talk about it.”

Hicks hopes that people will take it upon themselves to get educated – with a little push from activists. “I think (people should) educate themselves, allow us to send them information, get on our Web site, read about the truth, go online and teach themselves,” she encouraged. “I mean, you have to want to know though, and I think that’s the biggest part of it: just getting over that initial fear and then enforcing yourself to find sources that can inform you better.”

And, Brown added, if people aren’t informed about transmission, they won’t bother to get tested. “People need to know how it is and isn’t transmitted because we tend to go on witch hunts,” she said. “I mean, if this guy gets convicted for biting his neighbor, then any time somebody who’s HIV positive does something, it opens up the witch hunt. It adds to the stigma, which means more people won’t want to get tested.”

For Hicks, World AIDS Day is the perfect opportunity to end misinformation, spread understanding – and get tested for HIV. “That’s another thing we can all do, is make it a point to all share our knowledge with others,” she said. “We’re all not educated about something – I think that’s another way to look at it. So on World AIDS Day or this week or next week, these are all good times to begin to educate ourselves and our friends.”