Author Archive for drdue

Ask the Super Bowl Host Committee to Stand Up and Protect Children!


 

Targeting: Bill Lively (President and CEO), Tony Fay (VP of Communications), Larry McCoy (CFO), see more…
Started by: Melissa Snow

The trafficking of children for sale at the Super Bowl is well documented.  Texas Attorney General Abbott is taking a stand and has prepared a task force to identify and respond to traffickers who plan to sell children at the Super Bowl.  However, it is not enough to expect law enforcement and victim advocates to bear the entire burden of responding to this issue, which is expected to include many victims.  In support of the efforts of the task force, we are requesting the Super Bowl Host Committee embrace a proactive approach with community members by endorsing the “I’m Not buying It” campaign, which would raise awareness and deter the buying of children during the Super Bowl. 

As evidenced by the tremendous amount of work and money the Host Committee has channeled into Slant 45, clearly improving the lives of children is a priority. Countless children in the DFW region have benefitted by the commitment and opportunities provided by this program.

However, the children trafficked to DFW to meet the demand of the Super Bowl are being left to fend for themselves.  According to the Dallas Police Department children exploited through sex trafficking have an average life expectancy is just seven short years. The average age a child is tricked and trapped in sexual slavery is just 13 years old.  These children are beaten, brutalized and tortured for the profit and pleasure of others. 

This Super Bowl Host Committee’s hard work has turned the North Texas Region into a showcase with a record number of million-dollar sponsors, state-of-the-art infrastructure and events that appeal across audiences. They’ve set the standard for the Super Bowl experience.

Now, let’s join together and ask the Host Committee to take a stand and set the standard for all Super Bowl Host Committees to come. The Host Committee has the biggest megaphone to prevent the buying and selling of American children during this year’s festivities.  Law enforcement, legislators, non-profits, churches and business all are stepping up to the plate to stop this horrific abuse of our children. It’s time that the Host Committee faces the reality that children will be trafficked to North Texas and answer the question – What role will they play in preventing the sex trafficking of children during the Super Bowl?

DFW-based Traffick911 is leading a comprehensive game plan to protect American children. Local, national and international organizations have joined forces with Traffick911 in the I’m Not Buying It campaign. This Super Bowl Host Committee has proven it has the power and influence to make history. Join me in asking the Super Bowl Host Committee to endorse and fund the “I’m Not buying it” campaign to protect and defend children during the Super Bowl!!

 

Mountain View educator accused of sex assault!


A Mountain View High School instructional coach has been arrested on sex assault charges after she was found with a juvenile boy in North Lake Park late Friday.Courtney Bowles, a 31 year old Fort Collins resident, was arrested after officers found her with the unidentified juvenile at 10:40 p.m.

Thompson School District spokesman Wes Fothergill said Saturday that Bowles has been placed on administrative leave.

Parents at Mountain View were informed of the arrest through the school’s Infinite Campus program on the Internet and through telephone calls.

Bowles has been with the district since December 7, 2009, working as an instructional coach, which is a certified teacher who helps other teachers in helping to reach students.

 

The Black pulpit: For edification or for entertainment?


By Pastor Rasheed Z. Baaith

It is a time when our finances, our family life, the education of our children and the strength of our com-munities are at risk. Even our churches are no longer able to fill the holes in our lives as they once did.

Yet, we still attend services wanting to hear a word from the Lord, wanting to receive from our preachers Godly insight on how to handle the pressures of our day to day struggles.

Sadly, the intention of many in the pulpit is not to inform the people or teach the people but to entertain the people. It is for these preachers all about style and not substance. For these preachers the “whoop” and the celebration are more important than the spiritual imperative in their message.

Much of today’s preaching and many of our preachers are non confrontational when it comes to social issues, vague when speaking of what Christ expects from those who claim to His followers and as Gardner Taylor said, “lack of confidence about the authority of our own document.”

Our document is the Bible and we are to use that document to speak as deeply as we can to the needs of the people. We are to take people into the Presence of God and leave them there. Our charge is not to whoop or dance them into a place where all they remember is the good time they had. That is not our calling.

Our calling is based on our preaching responsibility. It is not to manufacture but to be authentic; preaching is not supposed to be a polished performance. Preachers are not supposed to fill themselves with themselves but fill the people with a working knowledge of God. A knowledge that will allow those in the pews to have a confidence they are prepared for the trials of the coming week.

We do not have to struggle at all to make the Bible relevant, it already is. It is a book full of every condition of real life and how God would have us handle this life. Sermons must speak to the needs of people and at the end of a sermon, the preacher should feel he/she gave the Word of God through the guidance of the Holy Spirit and was faithful to his/her call.

No piano run or heavy drum beat or dance can sustain someone in the midst of pain or distress caused by death or marriage woes or even just having had a very difficult week. Such a person needs to know that there is a balm in Gilead and Christ is the reason for that balm.

Many in the pulpit can excite a congregation, they can “work” a crowd but they do not give the people the message from God they needed to have.

The people got a good feeling but not good directions in how to live God’s Word. “Feel good” does not convert to something tangible outside the church doors to the battle field.

I read somewhere that preaching should have a clarity of thought, a lucidity of the language, a feel for Scripture, a capacity to see in Scripture what God has for people as it is seen through the Cross. None of these things can be manmade or affected.

Should there be celebration in a sermon? Yes. The Good News of the Gospel cannot be truly preached with-out celebrating what the Gift of Christ is.

But celebration should be connected to spiritual content. Not the other way around. Screaming at God and getting the congregation to scream with you does not mean He hears you.

Critics urge removal of gay signs!


— Billboards trying to drum up community support for gay black men were criticized Monday as a pastor, a daycare provider and a City Council member called for the billboards to come down.

The Rev. Alfred Thompkins, of Calvary Tabernacle, said the “I am gay” billboard message only encourages troubled youth to embrace homosexuality.

“A thirteen-year-old looks at these billboards and says, ‘That must be it, I must be gay,’?” he said. “That goes directly against God’s purpose. As a resident of Schenectady, a pastor who works with young people, with families, frankly I’m really bothered by the message these send.”

The billboards offer three messages, showing gay men with their families, in church and on a basketball court. Each message starts with the announcement “I am gay,” in large letters, and concludes with, “We have always been a part of this community.”

They were designed by In Our Own Voices, a gay advocacy group in Albany. The state Department of Health paid for the billboards as part of an effort to find a more effective way to reduce the HIV infection rate, which has disproportionately hit gay and bisexual black men. Last year, the Centers for Disease Control said the epidemic had reached such a level that new methods must be found to encourage men to use condoms.

But there is no overt mention of HIV on the billboards. In Our Own Voices is instead hoping that greater acceptance of homosexuality could lead men to make healthier choices.

Daycare provider Pamela Spicer told the City Council that the billboards were so vague they were worthless.

“These messages are a failure. I think the Department of Health needs their money back,” she said. “The intent is to instruct them not to spread HIV if they have it … That does not come across in the message.”

Instead, she said, the billboards allow “inappropriate sexual expression.”

She argued that the messages should be limited to adult business zones — mainly industrial areas at the outskirts of the city.

She told the council that her clients read the billboards as she drives them to events in the city. She offers daycare to a 2-year-old, 4-year-old and 8-year-old.

“When I’m driving them to the Schenectady Public Library and they say, ‘What does gay mean?’ how do I answer that question?” she said. “How do I expose them to such content?”

Thompkins compared gay people to thieves and liars, saying he did not want anyone to join the ranks of sinners.

City Councilman Joseph Allen agreed with both speakers, although he admitted that he hadn’t noticed the billboards.

“Now, I don’t care if you’re gay, straight or whatever, but I don’t think it’s necessary to advertise for them,” he said. “This is not kosher, as far as I’m concerned.”

He said the billboards could encourage teenagers to become gay.

“An adult, fine, you can do what you want,” he said. “But who’s going to read these? Young people, vulnerable kids. They don’t say, ‘Adult only.’?”

He called for legislation that would require billboard owners to get their messages approved by the council.

But Corporation Counsel L. John Van Norden said that would be illegal, citing the First Amendment, which guarantees free speech.

“You can’t control what people say, as hateful and objectionable as it may be,” he said.

Council President Gary McCarthy and Councilwoman Margaret King agreed that they have no control over the billboards. They declined to say whether they agreed with Allen’s objection to the message.

“It really becomes a free speech issue,” McCarthy said.

In other business, Councilman Carl Erikson was sworn in again, six months after his last swearing-in. He was appointed to the seat last June and had to win the November election to keep it.

As he put his hand on the Bible, his infant son solemnly added his own hand and patted the book enthusiastically. Then the baby tried to pull his father’s hand away.

Erikson had to grip the Bible through the second half of his oath as his wife struggled to hold the book and their son. Just as son Carl began to cry, Erikson got to the end, rushing to say, “to the best of my ability, so help me God.”

Erikson then delivered a speech in which he urged the council to take “bold risks” to improve the city, rather than simply doing what they’ve always done.

His wife listened from the doorway, where she was soothing their son outside the echoing council chamber.

Did Morgan Freeman REALLY have an affair with his step granddaughter!


This is a very touchy topic for me.  My most fond childhood memory of this actor( Morgan Freeman) was his role as Mr.Clark in the movie, “Lean on Me!”  Many of us who grew-up in the south (Yea Atlanta is the deep south) had a Mr.Clark.   This is why this story is somewhat difficult for me to believe.  I had to remove Morgan Freeman from the imagery of this man (Mr. Joe Clark) to the character of a more vulnerable “step grandfather.” Please be advised that it is estimated that approximately 20 million Americans have been victims of parent incest as children.

The allegations suggest that there was a more than ten year “incestuous” relationship  between Morgan Freeman and his step granddaughter.  Although, he is not her biological grandfather, this would still be deemed as inappropriate and incest. After looking at the facts, I am NOT totally convinced of the validity of the reports because all of this  information came out AFTER his wife filed for divorce. The story did break, but it appears that  African-American  communities did not buy into the allegations against Superstar Morgan Freeman,  last summer.

However, this is a very touchy topic in many of our communities and has to be addressed.  Many so-called “stepfathers” don’t see how bad this  behavior really impacts the future lives of  their stepchildren.   Dr. Diana Russell, a Sociology Professor out of Oakland, CA, conducted a study of 930 San Francisco woman. She discovered that 17% of the women, that is 1 in 6 of the women, had been molested by their stepfather.  On the otherhand, only 2% of biological fathers molested their daughters.  She also noted that most of the Very Serious Sexual Abuse was perpetrated by stepfather. (47% stepfather vs. 26% biological father)(Source: The Prevalence and Seriousness of Incestuous Abuse:  Stepfather vs. Biological Father by Diana E. H. Russell, PhD)

Some of the most serious cases of Major Depression, that I have personally treated, is of woman who were sexually abused and or traumatized by their stepfathers and fathers. Mothers this is a very serious phenomena. According to the reporters, Morgan’s step granddaughter (now 27 years old ) supposedly did tell her mother when she was seventeen. There are reports that Mrs.Freeman did confront her then husband.  However, the allegations suggest that the affair still  continued for ten years.  This is also alleged to be cited in the divorce filing by his wife.  Now parents, I am not sure of the Statute of Limitations* surrounding incest cases, but I am sure that they do exist  for this crime as with many other crimes.  Please note that this crime is punishable, by law, in most of our fifty states.  Although, I am not convinced that Morgan is guilty, I will use this opportunity to spring board into the importance of recognizing childhood incest.

I have to also mention that their is a new phenomena (within the last twenty years) where mothers/fathers are sexually abusing their sons.  This is becoming more and more prevalent. This conclusion is not yet out, on the Freeman case, but it certainly deserves honorable mention on the blog.  Sex crimes, to include incest, rape, etc.  are getting out of hand.

Warning Signs of Childhood Incest:

  • Your child will avoid or be very attached to the parent/stepparent
  • Your child will appear or actually be more sexual
  • The child may be anxious and paranoid
  • Or the child may appear disruptive and fearless
  • The child may present self-injurious behavior (i.e. cutting, suicidality or substance abuse)

As difficult as this may be for your to confront or deal with, if you suspect any form of sexual abuse of your child, NOTIFY the proper authorities immediately. This should be the case with either your young son or daughter. After this, please seek the appropriate medical and psychiatric attention for your child. This wil be essential for proper resolution of the event(s) and normal sexual development your child.

We always hope that our families will live healthy, full lives and make the right decisions. However, what happens when one of our family members become depressed, anxious, or display uncontrolled emotions? In this case, they may be suffering from a mental issue and not know it. A healthy mind makes for a healthy body; taking the Dr. Owens Mental Health Prescreen Assessment will ensure a healthier start on life!

True Prophets of God is this what you are hearing from the Lord?


WATCH: The World Mocks Those Who are Saying Massive Numbers of Birds and Fish are Dying because Obama Repealed ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ – But the Truth is Their Explanation Sounds Better than the World’s So Far

| No Comments


Cindy Jacobs says that birds and fish may be dying in large numbers because of the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Bishop Eddie Long’s Church Linked to Alleged Financial Fraud?


By Boyce Watkins, PhD on Dec 20th 2010 11:56PM

Bishop Eddie Long is in the media again, and not for good reason. Long and another Atlanta megachurch pastor, Gary Hawkins, have been linked to a mortgage company that is being investigated by federal authorities for allegedly stealing money from church members.

The company, Matrix Capital, has been allowed to hold financial seminars in the churches of both men, offering to help lower their mortgages in exchange for $1,500 payments. According to police, thousands of people paid money to Matrix but ended up filing bankruptcy and/or losing their homes.

Fred Lee, the proclaimed front man for the company, was allegedly able to convince quite a few church members to give him their money primarily because he addressed them within the confines of their joint church environment. The Secret Service and the DeKalb County Police are now investigating Lee.

In defense of Eddie Long, the church says that all his church did was provide a room for Lee to hold his seminars. Gary Hawkins was much more involved in supporting and promoting Lee by appearing on one of his videos, vouching for his credibility and integrity:

“I believe that, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that this man walks in great integrity,” Hawkins said in a company video.

One of the church members told CBS Atlanta that it was the pastor’s endorsement, which led her to trust Lee with her money. The woman claims she paid the money and later found out that she was in trouble with her mortgage because Matrix had allegedly never even made a phone call to the bank. She also claimed that Hawkins wouldn’t answer her questions when she went to him about her problem.

When it comes to this particular financial scheme, a few thoughts come to mind.

First, there is no evidence that Eddie Long promoted Matrix Capital or Fred Lee, so he should not necessarily be accused of swindling anyone. At the very least, however, he is learning a valuable lesson about properly vetting anyone making financial arrangements with people who trust him.

It is clear that if Lee was involved in any kind of scam, he was able to take advantage of the trust induced by the deep relationship that members of the congregation had with their respective pastors.

Second, this incident serves as yet another lesson regarding how African Americans and our churches evolve as it pertains to complex financial relationships.

I am willing to bet that someone came in and offered money to gain access to the pastors’ congregations, similar to the way Wells Fargo offered money to Tavis Smiley and black church leaders to allegedly sell predatory loans to members of urban communities.

When we take money from anyone offering it, we find ourselves in the middle of some peculiar situations that can lead to very bad outcomes. Our hunger for resources in the black community becomes an incredibly unhealthy habit in a nation that is addicted to mass consumption. Black folks have to be more intelligent than that and realize that money should be a tool for your liberation, not a pathway to spiritual demise.

The final lesson to be learned from this debacle (which happens in churches all throughout America) is the importance of making careful decisions and not putting too much trust in anyone, even our spiritual leaders.

While it is tempting to presume that you should put your financial livelihood in to the hands of the man or woman who runs your church, the reality is that far too many pastors allow their lust for money to overwhelm their desire to protect you or your family. So, thinking for yourself is critical, for there will always be financial predators seeking to take advantage of people during desperate times like these.

Westboro Baptist Church: God Sent the Shooter; This Church and it’s Pastor are the abomination/detestation to God! This Church is offensive to God.


January 9, 2011 – According to Westboro Baptist Church, the shooter responsible for the death of a federal judge, 9 year old Christina Greene, and others, as well as injuring Rep. Giffords, was sent from God. One of their web sites now boasts the news release “THANK GOD FOR THE SHOOTER-6 DEAD! WBC WILL PICKET THEIR FUNERALS! Shooter Jared Lee Laughner opened fire at a Tucson, AZ grocery store at a political rally—shot 18, including Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords; killing 6, including federal Judge John M. Roll. God appointed this rod for your sins! God sent the shooter!”You may be familiar with this church and their picketing of American soldier’s funerals, saying that these soldiers died for our sins. With the terrible tragedy in Arizona, the church has now said they will picket the funerals of those killed, including 9 year old Christina Greene. So while the families of these victims are in mourning, these people will be there saying it is because of our sins that they are dead.

While I am a firm believer in the freedom of religion, this church has taken that freedom way too far. To make a hero out of Jared Lee Loughner and say that he is fulfilling the work of God is an outrage. Yet, the freedom of religion protects them to say this. But how would it be different, if this religious establishment was of muslin origin? Would they be given the same protections? No, we all know they wouldn’t. They would be raided by the federal government and placed on a terror watch list. They would be charged with acts against Americans. Yet, this Westboro Baptist Church is free to essentially promote the killing of American citizens on a regular basis
 
 

 

Giffords tragedy could be a defining moment for Palin, Is this the kind of person you want for the President?


Within an hour of Saturday’s tragic shooting in Arizona, the Twittersphere had quickly seized on a map put out by Sarah Palin’s political action committee last year that had gun-sight images over the congressional districts of House Democrats she wanted to win for the GOP in 2010.

Among her targets: Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona, who was critically wounded by a gunman Saturday. His motives, authorities say, are not fully known. But friends of the suspect, Jared Loughner, have suggested that he had held a grudge for at least three years against Giffords dating back to when he met her in 2007.

Still, some believe that incendiary rhetoric like Palin’s bears some responsibility in the tragedy. Giffords herself had previously raised concerns about Palin’s map: “The way that she has it depicted has the cross hairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they have got to realize there are consequences to that action.”

[Photos: Nation mourns the tragedy in Arizona]

On Sunday,the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, Dick Durbin, cited the Palin map as a sign of the “toxic rhetoric” that has come to define national politics in recent years. He said he was not making a direct connection between Palin and the shootings.

Palin offered her condolences after the massacre Saturday in a brief message on Facebook and has said little else of it. But she did email conservative radio host Glenn Beck, who read part of their exchange on the air Monday morning, per Politico’s Keach Hagey. “I hate violence,” Palin wrote Beck. “I hate war. Our children will not have peace if politicos just capitalize on this to succeed in portraying anyone as inciting terror and violence.”

[Related: The intern who helped save Giffords' life]

Still, Palin has become a focal point in the debate over heated rhetoric, and her response is likely to be a defining moment in her political career. One informal but telling sign of the potential stakes for Palin: According to Facebook, the top question dominating debate on the site over the weekend was “Is Sarah Palin to blame?

So far, Palin’s team, angry that the former governor is being linked to the shooting, has struggled to contain the controversy. On Saturday, the map citing Giffords was abruptly pulled from the SarahPAC site — even though it remained on Facebook. Rebecca Mansour, a Palin aide, said on Twitter that the map was pulled because it “was no longer relevant” since the 2010 campaign was over.

In a subsequent interview with GOP radio host Tammy Bruce, Mansour defended the map. They weren’t gun sights but “surveyor’s symbols,” Bruce suggested, according to Alaska Dispatch, and Mansour agreed. But that contradicted Palin’s own prior characterization of the map’s symbol as a “‘bullseye’ icon.”

According to Alaska Dispatch, Mansour said attempts to link Palin to the shooting were “obscene” and “appalling.” She said there was “nothing irresponsible about our graphic.”

Palin is hardly the first politician to use gun or military imagery in campaigning. As the Palin’s supporters on the right noted, even President Obama has used similar metaphors, telling Democratic donors in 2008, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” And Palin’s former running mate, Arizona GOP Sen. John McCain, had defended Palin’s call for followers to “reload” as they rallied to capture Congress. “I’ve heard all of the language throughout my political career,” he said.

[Photos: Images of the suspect, Jared Lee Loughner]

But the bigger question is whether Palin will seek to passionately defend her comments and political ground — as she has been known to do during past controversies — or whether she, like other political figures in recent days, will urge her supporters to cool the rhetoric.

As Politico’s Jonathan Martin says: “Whether she defends, explains or even responds at all to the intense criticism of her brand of confrontational politics could well determine her trajectory on the national scene — and it’s likely to reveal the scope of her ambitions as well.”

GOP’s Embrace Of Violence: “Chickens Coming Home To Roost”


The big story right now is the murder of a federal judge, John Roll, and the attempted murder of Representative Giffords (D-AZ) by a deranged young man (the police have him in custody and are currently seeking a possible accomplice) at a mall in Tuscon. A number of other people were also killed and wounded including a 9 year old girl. The Sheriff has publicly called out the right wing demagogues who whip up “prejudice and bigotry” and lamented that Arizona seems to have become the “capitol of it.”

All of this is about to kick off a debate in this country about how responsible for right wing political violence are Republicans like Sarah Palin and others who are trying to ride the Tea Party to political power. Tea Partiers will say that this is the act of a lunatic and that it has no connection to politics at all. I agree that the man the police have arrested is probably mentally ill. But that does not mean that these murders are a-political or have no connection to the rhetoric and policies of the right.